It's plausible to deny it as well. Because "evolution" usually refers to some naturalistic process by which man arose without any supernatural act. So to say 'God could create Adam via evolution' is like saying 'God could create Adam without God.' Which is a contradiction.
"Usually," huh?
If the entirety of man's appearance, to include his development from single-celled organism to a being with a soul made in the likeness of his Creator, was set in motion by an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent God from nothing, with no other agent of influence upon it other than that Creator, then ALL of it is supernatural.
Your false differentiation of "naturalistic" as something separate from God's will, knowledge or plan seems absurd to me.