Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Video Link:

YOUR SECOND AMENDMENT http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=FOwy9OWfnAM

The expert made some excellent points in demolishing Gun Grabber talking points [Lies]

1 posted on 10/29/2014 7:43:34 AM PDT by HammerT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HammerT

Bill Whittle would make a terrific candidate for “high office”.


2 posted on 10/29/2014 7:45:28 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (At no time was the Obama administration aware of what the Obama administration was doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HammerT

I remember using this same argument, either from this source or one like it, in a college paper ten years ago.


4 posted on 10/29/2014 7:50:48 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HammerT

A varying & powerful take on RKBA, in light of the above:

The Founding Fathers were very clear they disliked standing armies, which could also be termed “well-regulated militia” (satisfying the application as insisted on by “anti’s” today). The 2nd’s preamble grudgingly recognizes (as the Founding Fathers did) that a standing army still is, for most practical purposes, still necessary to the nation’s security. Faced with the inevitable argument (as insisted on by “anti’s” today) that the existence of a standing army obviates the need for a seriously armed populace, the remainder of the 2nd states in no uncertain terms that the argument is outright rejected by the Constitution’s authors, signers & adherents, and that citizens retain that right regardless of whether a “standing army”/”well-regulated militia” exists.


6 posted on 10/29/2014 8:33:33 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (You know what, just do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HammerT

BULLSHT

The Second Amendment is written in blood and saltpeter, not ink.

My family has had firearms above the mantel since 1644 and in the longhouses since 1621.

The Constitutional ink is a re-affirmation of the 400 year old written right [1609,1621-1775] to have guns, the practice of that right, and the unfettered usage of guns by the people and the Mohawks [sic] under the Dutch , Abenaki under the French, and English colonial laws and treaties, resp., which said Constitutional rights were never changed until illegally in 1922 [against machine guns], 1934, 1946 and 1968 against all types of weapons. My gggrandfather had a 12 pounder cannon and a blunderbuss besides his muskets.

Look behind the ink for the blood of the people- that`s where the smell of powder tells you what is the truth, not some language expert, because my family has lived the precendential rights found in the Second Amendment since 1621 [N.A. treaty] and 1644.


7 posted on 10/29/2014 8:45:47 AM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HammerT

Well argued and easy to remember.


8 posted on 10/29/2014 10:04:23 AM PDT by Excellence (Marine mom since April 11, 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HammerT

bump for later


9 posted on 10/29/2014 10:29:48 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson