You creationists seem to be posting the same discredited arguments time and again.
Why I'm Bored Of Talking To Creationists is an article in Science 2.0 that pretty well sums up the situation. No matter how many times you address a logical fallacy or misinterpretation of observations the just pop up again and again. John C. Stanford and his idea of genetic entropy has been repeatedly debunked.
That was a pretty boring read itself.
I think the bigger question is why he talked to them in the first place?