Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peace! Peace! There is No Peace for Veterans or Iraqis
Townhall.com ^ | November 12, 2014 | John Ransom

Posted on 11/12/2014 7:43:33 AM PST by Kaslin

They have healed also the hurt of the daughter of my people slightly, saying, Peace, peace; when there is no peace. -- Jeremiah 6:14

Gentlemen may cry peace, peace—but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! -- Patrick Henry

Well, I for one am glad that the prince of peace ended that whole pesky Iraq War that he inherited from his predecessor. I’m reminded of how grateful I am as the United States, here at Veterans Day, just shortly after the Marine Corps birthday, authorized another 1,500 troops to go fight in a war that is been over ever since the Nobel Prize was awarded to our own master of the universe, Barack H. Obama.

“A team of about 50 military personnel are visiting a U.S. military airbase in Iraq’s Anbar province,” writes FoxNews, “after President Obama authorized the deployment of up to 1,500 more American troops to bolster Iraqi forces in the region in the fight against the Islamic State.”

I can’t imagine anything more gratifying to veteran troops than having to go back and secure a country than was once secured by them at great cost to their friends, to their psyche, to their armed strength.

The fight for Anbar province today is reminiscent of the fight for Al Anbar in 2003-2007. America eventually prevailed, but the fight cost the U.S. 9,500 casualties before the troop surge, a change in tactics to engage the enemy from longer distances and old-fashioned, American one-hundred dollar bills turned the calculus of victory to our side.

The most important part of the equation was an American commitment to a population that would have to live with the results of our mercurial political system, and our electorate.

As one former Ramadi Marine veteran reminded me, it wasn’t until Iraqis actually believed that the United States would stay to protect them that we fully secured the goodwill of the citizens we where there to protect.

And of course then we left on the flimsiest excuse: Obama wanted to be president of the United States and he did so by screwing over a whole bunch of countries. While American citizens can feel justifiable remorse over the most incompetent administration in U.S. history, no people were left worse off than the Iraqis by Obama’s election.

Obama will present the thin fig leaf excuse that the Iraqis didn’t want the U.S. there. But like the God of the Old Testament, we know the naked truth underneath the leaf.

And yes, there is shame in it. For we all know that Adam is naked underneath.

Obama sinned, he erred, he cut and ran, leaving Muslims, a group he says he cares about, worse off than they were before.

But then why should Iraqis be any different than African-Americans, or Hispanics or the elderly, or children, or women or the other foils to Obama’s superiority?

History is littered with people Obama “cared” about that he left worse off.

Yesterday was Veterans Day; the day before was the Marine Corps birthday.

The Marines bore a heavy load of the fighting in Al Anbar. But even more they served as ambassadors for the magnificence of the American spirit, the generosity of our aims and our hopes for Iraqis future.

I wasn’t through force of arms that these Marines conquered. It’s never how America wins.

“The only hope for the future [the Iraqis] could see was to be found in what members of [Marine Expeditionary Force] had done and were doing on their behalf,” writes Major General John F Kelly of what he calls the Anbar Awakening, “despite the heat, the criticism from home, and the killing and casualties. They began to see us as a force that was sharing in their agony. Once they tried reaching out to some soldier or Marine’s outstretched hand in friendship, it was over.”

And once we withdrew that hand it was over and over again.

This time when we extend it, let’s do it permanently.

We owe it to ourselves, to the Iraqis, and to our veterans who shared the agony of the Iraqis as brothers and as men.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 201411; anbar; anbarprovince; barack0bama; betrayal; iraq; isil; isis; nobelpeaceprice; obama

1 posted on 11/12/2014 7:43:34 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

#YouMightBeALiberal if you think it’s possible to “end the war” when the other side started it and doesn’t agree to stop it.


2 posted on 11/12/2014 9:04:00 AM PST by walford (https://www.facebook.com/wralford [feel free to friend me] @wralford on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Heck, I was PO’d when we got sent back to the World when we “won” the first Persian Gulf War, Operation Desert Storm. I knew we’d be back. Only it wasn’t me and my compatriots, it was my very much younger cousins and their compatriots, a decade or so later.

Now we’ve gone and done it twice, and all because some of our folks “ain’t a gonna study war no more.” Stupid fools.

“If ye would have peace, prepare ye then for war.” At least one old Roman knew better.

Old Student.


3 posted on 11/12/2014 2:27:23 PM PST by Old Student (Do NOT make me get out the torches and pitchforks...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death

Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.

No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well as abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House. But different men often see the same subject in different lights; and, therefore, I hope it will not be thought disrespectful to those gentlemen if, entertaining as I do opinions of a character very opposite to theirs, I shall speak forth my sentiments freely and without reserve. This is no time for ceremony. The questing before the House is one of awful moment to this country. For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. Should I keep back my opinions at such a time, through fear of giving offense, I should consider myself as guilty of treason towards my country, and of an act of disloyalty toward the Majesty of Heaven, which I revere above all earthly kings.

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those who, having eyes, see not, and, having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it.

I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace themselves and the House. Is it that insidious smile with which our petition has been lately received? Trust it not, sir; it will prove a snare to your feet. Suffer not yourselves to be betrayed with a kiss. Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with those warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land. Are fleets and armies necessary to a work of love and reconciliation? Have we shown ourselves so unwilling to be reconciled that force must be called in to win back our love? Let us not deceive ourselves, sir. These are the implements of war and subjugation; the last arguments to which kings resort. I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motive for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us: they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging. And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain. Shall we resort to entreaty and humble supplication? What terms shall we find which have not been already exhausted? Let us not, I beseech you, sir, deceive ourselves. Sir, we have done everything that could be done to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne, and have implored its interposition to arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry and Parliament. Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne! In vain, after these things, may we indulge the fond hope of peace and reconciliation. There is no longer any room for hope. If we wish to be free— if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending—if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained—we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of hosts is all that is left us!

They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power. The millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Besides, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us. The battle, sir, is not to the strong alone; it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave. Besides, sir, we have no election. If we were base enough to desire it, it is now too late to retire from the contest. There is no retreat but in submission and slavery! Our chains are forged! Their clanking may be heard on the plains of Boston! The war is inevitable—and let it come! I repeat it, sir, let it come.

It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace— but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!


4 posted on 11/12/2014 2:34:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If only we had a Patrick Henry with us today!


5 posted on 11/12/2014 2:38:12 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trisham

6 posted on 11/12/2014 2:42:38 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Thanks, 2ndDivisionVet! :)


7 posted on 11/12/2014 2:44:12 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson