Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA/JPL's Airship Challenge (A NASA Centennial Challenges Program)
NASA/JPL ^ | 25NOV2014 | JPL Staff Writer

Posted on 11/25/2014 12:15:34 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine

Airships aren't just powered balloon-like vehicles that hover above sporting events. Researchers at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, are floating the idea that airships have potential for important scientific and commercial uses.

NASA is considering issuing a challenge for developing stratospheric airships that can break records in terms of duration of flight at high altitudes. The agency has issued a request for information for this contemplated "20-20-20 Airship Challenge." Submissions will be accepted until December 1.

"We are seeking to take astronomy and Earth science to new heights by enabling a long-duration, suborbital platform for these kinds of research," said Jason Rhodes, an astrophysicist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, who is leading the effort on the possible challenge.

A blimp is one example of an airship; a zeppelin, which has a rigid body, is another. By definition, an airship must be powered, navigable, and lighter than air.

The idea behind the 20-20-20 Airship Challenge would be to achieve unprecedented airship milestones. The first "tier" of competition would be to get an airship with a 44-pound (20 kilogram) payload to stay at an altitude of 65,000 feet (20 kilometers) for 20 hours. More ambitious ship-builders can aim for the second tier, with the same height but carrying a 440-pound (200-kilogram) payload for 200 hours.

"The 65,000-foot mark is the sweet spot where the airship would get as high as possible while still having enough air to propel against, because it needs propulsion to stay in the same spot. It's also a good altitude in terms of average wind speed," Rhodes said.

So far, no powered airship has been able to sustain this altitude for more than eight hours. Balloons do fly at this height -- for example, weather balloons -- but they are subject to prevailing winds, and may be less reliable.

In the framework being considered, the total airship prize purse may range from 2 to 3 million dollars, and could be split into multiple prize awards for successful demonstrations of the two competition tiers.

NASA's request for information is to gauge the interest among various communities that would be interested in using the airships or directly constructing them. A 2013 Keck Institute study, co-authored by Rhodes, showed that there is substantial interest in using airships for academic and possibly industrial uses.

An airship could have a telescope on either end of it to create high-resolution images of stars and other celestial objects, for example. Scientists who study Earth could benefit from data collected by airships at this altitude, such as for investigating climate change and weather.

"You would be able to follow weather patterns, even get above a hurricane. A satellite can't do that because its orbit can't be changed," Rhodes said.

There are also potential commercial uses. For instance, telecommunications companies could make use of the airships to provide wireless Internet to remote areas.

"We're only limited by our imagination," Rhodes said.

NASA is also interested in hearing from potential competitors who would be motivated to build the airships, in addition to non-profits interested in running the challenge or partnering on building a payload.

Unlike a balloon, which travels with air currents, airships can stay in one spot. The stationary nature of airships allows them to have better downlink capabilities, because there is always a line-of-sight communication.

"We're not looking at any manned capability at the moment but that doesn't preclude that in the future," Rhodes said.

NASA's Centennial Challenges program offers incentive prizes to generate revolutionary solutions to problems of interest to NASA and the nation. The program seeks competitors from diverse and non-traditional sources, including small businesses, industry and academia.

"Formulating a challenge that focuses on the technology of airships is an exciting new sector for Centennial Challenges to explore for a possible prize competition," said Sam Ortega, Centennial Challenges program manager.

The NASA Centennial Challenges office sponsors the development of the Airship Challenge. The 2013 Airships Study was supported by JPL and the Keck Institute for Space Studies at the California Institute of Technology. Caltech manages JPL for NASA.

More information about the request for information is online at: http://go.usa.gov/7hfS


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: airship; challenge; jpl; nasa

1 posted on 11/25/2014 12:15:34 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

2 posted on 11/25/2014 12:15:50 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=a866ad8815ebc846de7186702ac08ae4&tab=core&_cview=1

A—NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION {NASA} CENTENNIAL CHALLENGESPROGRAM
Solicitation Number: NNH15STMD002L
Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Office: Headquarters
Location: Office of Procurement (HQ)

Solicitation Number:
NNH15STMD002L

Notice Type:
Sources Sought

NASA is seeking your response to the Airship RFI provided as a link at the bottom or the top of this page. A response form is also included to assist you in your submission.
NASA is considering a stratospheric airship challenge to incentivize the demonstration of a long duration scientific platform for both Earth and space sciences. In 2013, a Keck Institute study (Airships: A New Horizon for Science) demonstrated significant interest in airships as a science platform from the academic community and possible industrial partners. The final study report can be found at http://kiss.caltech.edu/stu dy/airship/final-report.pdf .

There are few opportunities for space missions in astronomy and Earth science. Airships (powered, maneuverable, lighter-than-air vehicles that can navigate a designated course) could offer significant gains in observational persistence over local and regional areas, sky and ground coverage, data downlink capability, payload flexibility, and over existing suborbital options at competitive prices. We seek to spur a demonstration of the capability for sustained airship flights as astronomy and Earth Science platforms in a way that is complementary with broad industry interests.

This 20-20-20 Airship Challenge is currently contemplated as a two-tiered challenge that could provide opportunities to evaluate a wide range of innovative methods to launch an airship into the stratosphere, maintain altitude, and station-keep for a defined period of time. This challenge would seek to engage the aerospace industry, educational institutions, and amateurs to provide solutions. The Challenge is considering a total prize purse ranging from $1 to $1.5 million dollars, which would be split into multiple prize awards for successful demonstrations of a stratospheric airship that could accomplish the following tasks:

Reach a minimum altitude of 20 km. Maintain the altitude for 20 hours (200 hours for Tier 2 competition). Remain within a 5 km diameter station area (and navigate between two designated points for Tier 2). Successfully return the 20 kg payload (200 kg for Tier 2 competition) and payload data. Show Airship scalability for longer duration flights with larger payloads through a scalability review.

The competition could take place over the next 3 to 4 years. Comments must be submitted in electronic form no later than 5:00pm Eastern Time on December 1, 2014 to Mr. Sam Ortega at e-mail address: HQ-STMD-CentennialChallenges@mai l.nasa.gov . Please use 202020 Challenge on the Subject line.


3 posted on 11/25/2014 12:17:37 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Moslems get preference.


4 posted on 11/25/2014 12:21:25 PM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

“We ran out of ideas on how to get things into space or orbit, so we’ll just set our sights a bit lower”.

OR

“Muslim outreach prevents us from going to other planets, due to some fatwah or something. This is allah’s will or some crap”.


5 posted on 11/25/2014 12:21:46 PM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

They have been talking about a “new age” of lighter than aircraft my entire life. Yet nothing makes it (commercially viable) past the covers of “Popular” magazines and now FR.


6 posted on 11/25/2014 12:22:20 PM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

Kind of like the Moller Skycar :)


7 posted on 11/25/2014 12:25:29 PM PST by The Cajun (Ted Cruz, Sarah Palin, Mark Levin, Mike Lee, Louie Gohmert....Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

I didn’t know FR magazine had a cover! LOL!


8 posted on 11/25/2014 12:28:07 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

maybe JPL needs to talk to Aeros in Irvine ca about their airship challange


9 posted on 11/25/2014 12:33:11 PM PST by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

How does this make Muslims feel good about themselves?


10 posted on 11/25/2014 1:10:59 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

If it doesn’t they’ll cancel the whole thing.


11 posted on 11/25/2014 1:13:37 PM PST by Jack Hydrazine (Pubbies = national collectivists; Dems = international collectivists; We need a second party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm...

A very perplexing challenge. I’ll have to think about it for a bit.


12 posted on 11/27/2014 9:49:56 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson