Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Grimmy
Why should the fed be paid for land the fed has no right to own in the first place?

Because it belongs to them and they realize revenue from it?

14 posted on 12/04/2014 1:50:34 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

The Constitution lists very clearly what the US gov is allowed to own within a state.

Ports for US Navy. Forts and armories for the US Army. District of Columbia. Land needful for buildings necessary for conducting the business of the US gov within the state. Right of ways to and from those.

The rest is only and has ever only been, a contra Constitutional power grab by the US gov.

There is another clause that deals with territories, but as we all know, territories are not states. Once a territory became a state, all limits upon the US gov concerning states must go into effect.


17 posted on 12/04/2014 1:56:32 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson