Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
Actually, I wasn't clear before. The infections are worse because of mutations that create new bacteria. For instance, MRSA isn't known to have existed before the early 1960s and didn't become widespread until the late 1990s.

But you are correct, they aren't actually stronger, they are just more resistant to what we have available.

21 posted on 12/12/2014 12:44:47 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee
Probably another nit. But MRSA is not a "new bacteria." It's simply a new strain of Staphylococcus aureus, which has been around a very long time.

Now that it's resistant, it can go back to doing to people what Staph infections did before penicillin. Which isn't pretty.

23 posted on 12/12/2014 1:04:46 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson