Rudy, warts and all, would have been a much better POTUS than anyone the Republicans have nominated since Reagan.
Instead, look at the litany of losers the GOP has nominated.
Agreed.
When Rudy is right he’s really right.
Rudy, warts and all, would have been a much better POTUS than anyone the Republicans have nominated since Reagan.
I believe he would have been a good one.
He’s spot-on with that statement.
Deblasio, Obama, Sharpton... all of them.
Those two cops paid with their lives for all of the BS racial rhetoric these three were carping about.
Police departments across the country need to be on alert for more of this kind of crap now.
He would have been a double edge sword for conservatives (really wrong on social issues and damn wrong on gun control), but your statement is probably right looking back at the history.
Would have been light years better than Obama. Better than Romney or McCain too. Not such a high bar ref any of our leaders these days.
“Rudy, warts and all, would have been a much better POTUS than anyone the Republicans have nominated since Reagan.”
Agree entirely.
Rudy wasn’t pure enough.....never mind that he’s a strong leader...never mind that he was law and order....no never mind all that ......couldn’t support him and what do we get instead?....the mealy mouth mouse of the SWest....McBrainless...
The backlash on this against dems will ensure a victory in 2016, especially if they continue down this insane criminal thug murdering burning stealing animal worship.
You are correct, but the problem is that one of his "warts" is his absolute inability to gain traction in the Republican Primary. Didn't happen in 2008 and won't happen in 2016, should he decide to try again.