If the court has ruled that corporations are people when it comes to free speech as expressed through political donations then how can they rule that corporations are not people when it comes to religious freedom?
We see too many occurrences today where someone is forced to provide a service to someone else in the name of that someone else’s “right” to special government treatment. Should I be forced to bake a gay wedding cake? To provide access to abortion? Apparently we need a Constitutional amendment now just to re-clarify the 1st amendment. Not only should we be free to express our beliefs, but be free of the government forcing us to express the beliefs of others.
Not forcing beliefs on anyone. Anyone can go buy their own contraceptives. No one is stopping them.
If anyone really wants the government in their bedroom... sterilization or castration comes to mind...."don't doubt me..."
Let's hope!
The atheists in government have gotten away with FAR too much
I don’t think that will happen, since the Supreme Court just threw out the case of two Catholic firemen challenging the requirement that they ride in a gay pride parade with the fire engine, supporting an earlier ruling against the firemen that their appearance was incidental to the parade and thus not an imposition on their beliefs.
This is the first time the Supreme Court has said corporations have this right in more than 200 years in our nations history, Gans said during an event at the Cato Institute. Hobby Lobby is big news because it does say for the first time in our nations history secular, for-profit corporations are entitled to religious free exercise rights.
O God forbid... the first amendment actually limit the government rather than grant 2 Federal employee defined freedoms to the people. You know the way it is actually written with “Congress shall make no law....”
I forgot PJ don’t believe in any kind of God much-less understand any of the rights that God has graciously bestowed upon us.