Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Interesting that Anheuser-Busch is on the list. This is one beer I detest. I drink Fat Tire and Guinness.


1 posted on 01/03/2015 4:08:54 AM PST by HomerBohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HomerBohn

The government has also been instrumental in keeping the master-baiter afloat!

2 posted on 01/03/2015 4:16:04 AM PST by Zakeet (Obama: fail ... deny ... blame ... golf ... distract ... lie ... repeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn

A little black mail goes a long way.


3 posted on 01/03/2015 4:17:12 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn

Are they supporting Sharpton or are they victims of extortion?


4 posted on 01/03/2015 4:17:55 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
Mmmm.....Al looks so demure in pale blue snd jonquil yellow.

I hope none of them outfits is (gasp) cotton----from one of them racist Southern plantations.

5 posted on 01/03/2015 4:18:11 AM PST by Liz (Pres Reagan on govt shutdown: "Let's close it down and see if anyone notices.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn

http://nypost.com/2008/06/15/rev-al-soaks-up-boycott-bucks/

EXCERPT

Terrified of negative publicity, fearful of a consumer boycott or eager to make nice with the civil-rights activist, CEOs write checks, critics say, to NAN and Sharpton – who brandishes the buying power of African-American consumers. In some cases, they hire him as a consultant.

(snip)

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/19/nyregion/questions-about-al-sharptons-finances-accompany-his-rise-in-influence.html

National Action Network’s revenue has increased sharply, to more than $4 million in both 2011 and 2012, the year of the group’s most recent tax filing.

Much of that revenue appears to be from large corporate sponsors. A person who handled solicitations at a company that has supported the group said National Action Network often requested $50,000 or $100,000 to sponsor events.

Mr. Sharpton said his birthday party grossed about $1 million, enough to clear up the organization’s tax debts, removing a cloud that has long hung over the group and himself.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/rev-al-sharpton-1m-birthday-nonprofit-article-1.1961881

Rev. Al Sharpton gets $1M in birthday gifts to help bail out his nonprofit

The Rev. Al Sharpton received a big present for his 60th birthday bash — $1 million in contributions to help bail out his nonprofit National Action Network.

A thick, glossy program distributed to guests who attended the lavish Four Seasons party Wednesday night lays out the companies that ponied up. ATT and the developer Forest City Ratner paid for full page ads at what was called the “Activist Level.”

GE Asset Management and Walmart saluted NAN with half-page ads at the “Preacher Level.”

The Humane Society, billionaire Ron Perelman’s holding company MacAndrews & Forbes, McDonald’s, DC37, Verizon and the Partnership for New York City got in at the lower “Track Suit Level” at the back of the book.

In an interview, Sharpton said he didn’t know what the different donor levels gave because fund-raising was outsourced to an event planner. He said “corporate checks take 90 days” to cash, so it was too early to say exactly who paid what, but he said the party brought in a projected $1 million.

(snip)

Three-term former Mayor Michael Bloomberg wrote: “You’re truly a unique American voice. A voice that has matured a great deal without mellowing one bit. And your best days are still ahead.”

Sharpton stayed quiet about Bloomberg’s decision to overturn term limits after he received a $110,000 grant from the mayor’s nonprofit, the Daily News reported at the time.


9 posted on 01/03/2015 4:51:28 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HomerBohn
I guess these companies are either a.) stupid, or b.) gluttons for punishment. Or both.

Actually it is probably much simpler than that. I think they prefer bribery to bad PR. It's less expensive.

16 posted on 01/03/2015 6:16:41 AM PST by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson