There will be refutations between witnesses, yes.
The point is that sending armed foreign agents into an allied nation, or any nation, without coordination with the responsible local public safety or defense officials, is asking for major troubles. Especially when the so-called reason for their presence was such an obvious lie (or else it constituted almost a declaration of war against the host country). Put simply, anyone coming into MY community packing major heat and (allegedly by some witnesses, at least) threatening our people or village...and then giving such patently ridiculous excuses for even their presence there, while waving or carrying M-16’s — is asking for MAJOR TROUBLE. Major trouble. This is so obvious as to not even be worth commentary. Other than to observe that this little invasion style operation has Agent Provocateur Effort written all over it. The superiors of these wayward, armed personnel were just looking to create an incident, trouble. They failed to really do it very well this time. But watch, they’ll be back. They have the “audacity” to keep pushing for the “transformations” they want.
That is the most ridiculous post of the year.
If people were pointing sniper rifles at law enforcement near Cliven Bundy’s ranch, or even if it wasn’t that but was some sort of quasi-law enforcement people working with the local police or if it were other people, and even if there was no coordination with local public safety, etcetera, would that make it right to do that?
They were accused of pointing an M-16, but that is untrue according to this news report.
I don’t have time for the last third of your post as it is all conspiracy theory...