Where's Ben Affleck's response to the killing?
PS USA Today, of all places, ran the offending cartoons online tonight.
Hey Bill, if you’re so f-ing smart, how come you’ve only just figured this out?
What a dork.
>> “I know most Muslim people would not have carried out an attack like this,”
That’s not saying much about “most Muslim people.”
Maher is a hater himself, but he’s absolutely right on this.
I can even understand why some Muslims might be offended by the Charlie Hedbo cartoon. But here is the big difference:
Offend Christians or Jews or blacks or gays and they’ll demonstrate against you. They’ll picket and march and shout slogans. Perhaps a few will even riot. However, they won’t take that as an excuse to kill people.
If some Muslims wanted to protest outside the paper’s offices, I would have no problem with them. Instead, they chose to engage in acts of terrorism in the name of their religion.
Radical Muslims are those who don’t believe the Koran and try to get along with others.
Islamists attacked Charlie Hebdo but (so far) not Bill Maher and USA Today. That shows you who is important to the cultists.
I think billions would support a nuke detonating over Mecca.
“I know most Muslim people would not have carried out an attack like this,”
.
It’s because most Muslims are not trained to do so, but that is not saying that most muzzies would not have minded to do so.
These terrorists were not just run-of-the-mill Muslims — one had trained in Yemen.
I suspect if a Republican was President, his comment would be different.
Mahr at least doesn’t deny the obvious, unlike our president and SOS. Progress? I’d say yes.
‘Charlie Hebdo” normally prints a run of 60,000.
They are now going to print ONE MILLION - full of the cartoons/!
KUDOS!!!! -
I’ thinking they may have to do some reprints - people world wide are going to want one!
History is full of such relatively (seemingly) small atrocities setting off the powder keg -
Just once I want to hear a liberal/leftist/democrat make a truthful statement critical of Islam and/or muslims without inserting an apology or a qualifier such as:
“I know most Muslim people would not have carried out an attack like this”
Or
“We know that this dastardly act was carried out by a few terrorists and that most muslims are good people who do not approve of such conduct”
Or
“These are just a few bad apples who do not follow the teachings of the Koran or the Prophet”
Radical muslims want to behead you. Moderate muslims want radical muslims to behead you.
Fact is, Charlie Hebdo made fun of other celebrities and politicians, but the same never attacked them for it, and in fact the same targets of the paper a rallying in support for the publication.
MSNBc and Ron Paul need to get a fracking clue.
If he’s figured out that Mudslimes are bad, why did he vote for one in 2008 and 2012?
How about a billion?
WHY MUSLIMS ARE VIOLENT
This is pretty straight forward folks. There are peaceful Muslims, but there is no such thing as peaceful Islam. Violence is not an aberration in Islam—it is DOCTRINE. Dozens of passages in the Quran exhort Muslims to hate or kill or terrorize infidels (non-Muslims) wherever they find them. For examples, see Suras 2:190-193, 2:216, 2:244, 3:56, 3:142, 3:151, 4:56, 4:74 (beheading), 4:76, 4:84, 4:89, 4:91, 4:95, 4:104, 5:51, 5:32-38, 7:96-99, 8:12-15 (beheading), 8:39, 8:57-60, 8:65-67, 9:5, 9:14, 9:20-30, 9:38-41, 9:73, 9:88, 9:111, 9:123, 17:16, 18:65-81, 21:44, 22:18-22, 25:52, 33:60-62, 47:3-4 (beheading), 47:35, 48:16-17, 48:29, 61:4, and 66:8-12. These are the passages that jihadists quote in defense of their horrible atrocities. Unlike the Old Testament, violence in the Quran is mostly open-ended, that is, not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding events.
While there are passages that Muslims point to that might suggest peaceful solutions (Suras 2:190, 2:256, 5:8, 5:28, 5:32, 8:61, 29:46, 41:34, 109:6), these are overwhelmed by the violent ones. Indeed, the peaceful passages were abrogated, i.e. superseded, by the violent ones—because the violent ones were written later, after Muhammad’s move to Medina (from Mecca). Anyone who wants to commit acts of violence has perfect justification for doing so from the Quran. There is nothing in the Quran comparable to Jesus’ teachings to “turn the other cheek” and to “love your neighbor.”
You can look these passages up for yourself. Below is a site that has three translations of the Quran side-by-side. (Note: English translators of the Quran sometimes try to soften the true Arabic meaning of some of these passages. For example, to “fight” really means to kill in Arabic.)
http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran
In addition to the Quran are the hadiths. These are collections of sayings and actions of Muhammad. Indeed, Muhammad was one of the most violent men in history, setting the example for all Muslims to follow. See this link:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm
For more information, see our Faith Facts article:
http://www.faithfacts.org/world-religions-and-theology/christianity-vs.-islam
(If you like our site, tell your friends about us.)
I don’t agree with him on most issues but I absolutely share Bill Maher’s anti-Muslim views.
That Left can’t or won’t see the totalitarian and terrorist nature of Islam isn’t our problem.
The most extreme, intolerant and reactionary countries in the world are all Muslim. They are the ones anti-Jewish, anti-black, anti-woman and anti-gay. They’re against every liberal value.
Yet liberals defend Islam. This is an attitude that needs to be countered if the West is to survive.
