WHITE HOUSE PLANS CONFERENCE ON COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM

Breitbart/AP ^ | 1/11/2015 | staff

[military cop]

Let me guess: number one threat in the US: white hetrosexual law enforcement employed Right Wing Christian Extremists and ex military who are members of the NRA

Did I get it all?

RLTW

[daler]

What we really need is a “blue ribbon panel” to investigate why it is radical Muslims like to saw people’s heads off on live TV. /s

[plain talk]

a conference on this subject is a bad idea

1. if they speak in usual generalities then the muslim terrorists get yet another example of how weak we are

2. If they were to speak of specific actions to take against the terrorists then publicizing those tactics is not exactly a good idea

I see no possible benefit. these sorts of discussions should be secret and private

[upchuck]

All the hot air expended at this “conference” will do nothing to stop terrorism but will do gang busters for Glo-Bull Warming.

Here’s a quick take on how to determine if this conference is really serious: Do the participants use “tell it like it is” words like terror, terrorism, radical Islam, Islamic radicals, or Islamic terrorists? Or do the participants wimp out and refer to these people as activists, militants, insurgents, rebels, gunmen, extremists, separatists or armed men?

World of difference.

[DakotaGator]

Indeed ;-)