To: Zhang Fei
Or they could take those coal-fired plants out of mothballs. Not a bad idea! I wonder where the jet stream goes when it leaves Europe, carrying the exhaust from all those coal-fired power plants?
38 posted on
01/18/2015 3:39:58 PM PST by
COBOL2Java
(I'm a Christian, pro-life, pro-gun, Reaganite. The GOP hates me. Why should I vote for them?)
To: COBOL2Java
Not a bad idea! I wonder where the jet stream goes when it leaves Europe, carrying the exhaust from all those coal-fired power plants? I expect existing (mothballed) plants have the SO2 removed, so nobody really cares, except for global warming greenies. Coal accounts for 40% of the US's power, and we don't have any problems with acid rain. The issue with the EPA's mandates is its insistence that coal power stations reduce CO2 emissions. Those enhancements cost an arm and a leg, and make them uncompetitive with gas-fired power stations. Of course, if gas prices shoot up, then I see coal-fired stations getting built, with the CO2 emissions scrubbers.
46 posted on
01/18/2015 3:50:56 PM PST by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: COBOL2Java
In China, homes and offices
burn coal for heat. I expect most of its air pollution problems come from small, inefficient and dirty heating systems, rather than power plants.
94 posted on
01/18/2015 5:34:22 PM PST by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson