Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PreciousLiberty

It is not pro war. It portrays the horrors of war and the impact on those that fight them.


4 posted on 01/24/2015 8:06:21 PM PST by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Oldexpat

It’s both. It portrays the horrible impact of war, but it also celebrates it’s righteousness. Christendom has been defending itself from Satan’s troops for almost 600 years. More Vlad, less Barack. More Clint!


8 posted on 01/24/2015 8:12:27 PM PST by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Oldexpat

The movie is pro Patriot.


14 posted on 01/24/2015 8:17:21 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (Laughter is the best medicine, unless you have diarrhea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Oldexpat

“It is not pro war. It portrays the horrors of war and the impact on those that fight them.”

I think, as with many things, that the term “pro-war” is not specific enough. Clearly, there are times that war is the best alternative. That does not make it desirable, it is only necessary. That is what most define as “pro-war”.

The problem with many in this country is they refuse to admit the necessity.

Was the Iraq War “necessary”? That’s entirely arguable, but clearly our leaders at the time thought so. I personally believe there was sufficient justification. Do a search on “Iraq anthrax”....


20 posted on 01/24/2015 8:32:36 PM PST by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson