Wouldn't that require one of those "law" thingies? That require congressional involvement? Used to anyway.
I always go on the assumption that whatever he does is done to damage America.
Has his highness ever even BEEN to Alaska?!
F U B O!
IDIOCY!
Then I remembered and realized.
It's All "Part of the Plan" >:(
Putz
“But there are heightened protections the Interior Department will start implementing on its own. “
The attack of the bureaucracy continues unabated.
He really is a domestic enemy of the United States.
Completely moronic.
Which is why it was proposed. I am convinced BO and his boss Valerie hate the three Cs:
(classical, biblical) Christianity
(original intention) Constitution
(free market) Capitalism
I look forward to Ted Cruz firing 3/4 of the Department of Interior and rolling it back to be nothing but park Rangers and firefighting.
Rush has been the only person I’ve heard say, essentially, “you haven’t seen anything yet, wait until you see the next two years” when speaking about the lawlessness and anti-Americanism of Obama.
He only has 2 years to destroy all our energy resources
How many more SOTUs does he have to take credit for low energy prices after killing the energy industry?
Drilling in ANWR is about the size of a postage stamp on a football field. This is all part of “necessarily skyrocket.”
If he and his leftist/Islamist operatives could, OBAMA WOULD MAKE AMERICA A WILDERNESS AND BARREN WASTELAND WITH ITS RESIDUAL POPULATION ENSLAVED.
EVERYTHING obama does either:
a) Weakens America/AmericansThere are no counter examples.
b) Distances America's allies
c) Strengthens America's enemies
d) Serves Islam
e) Harms Israel
Or some combination of the above.
Permanently? You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
If the president can do that under his own power the next president can undo it. If it requires a law then the next congress and president can undo it. Well, assuming that the Republicans ever get the spine to reverse the leftward ratchet of our government.
Doggone, I thought all the critters had been killed off, driven to extinction by north slope mines, the oil pipeline and global warming. Well, with the inevitable hothouse climate coming, why bother to save the already doomed polar bear and caribou? Are you sure Sarah Palin hasn’t already wiped them out with her blood lust hunting?
” He called ANWR an “incredible place, pristine, undisturbed...”
Has he ever SEEN a picture of the coastal plain? Besides being only a tiny fraction of ANWR, it’s a barren wasteland. Apparently during his 57-state tour, he never managed to get up there.
Obama is not only a Muslim sympathizer, he is at war with USA. There - I’ve said it. I have no intentions of taking it back.
http://boards.fool.com/a-cartoonist-on-anwr-14981148.aspx
Scott Adams (creator of Dilbert):
I might feel different if I planned to visit the Alaskan Wildlife
Preserve anytime soon. But I don’t know what I would do once I got
there, aside from praying that I froze to death before I got eaten
by a caribou, or a koala bear, or a bat. I’ve seen pictures of the
Alaskan Wildlife Preserve and I can sum it up in just two words:
North Dakota. Do we really need two North Dakotas? I mean, we
already have South Dakota as an emergency spare.
Its just common sense. Why drill ANWR and give 90% of the royalty to Alaska? Drill those areas that Obama opened and the feds get to keep 100% of the royalty.
