Skip to comments.
Warmists getting angrier
American Thinker ^
| February 1, 2015
| Thomas Lifson
Posted on 02/01/2015 11:01:23 AM PST by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
02/01/2015 11:01:23 AM PST
by
george76
To: george76
“Off with their heads”....is the new mantra of some conductors of Global Warming Jihad regarding the hated “Deniers”. Man-made global warming advocates have many of the attributes of Islamists and can tolerate NO opposition.
To: george76
Go ahead, Warmists, be angry, real angry. Then you’ll be like those Angry Atheists that nobody wants around them and most are learning to just ignore.
To: george76
There were two words in that article that I've never seen before: "tosme" and "winge."
Rose offers a worthwhile chronicle of tosme of the other extreme language being employed by the cult.
and...
Observer columnist Nick Cohen says he is sick of hearing climate sceptics whinge that being called 'deniers' equates them with those who deny the Holocaust...
4
posted on
02/01/2015 11:09:20 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
To: House Atreides
Off with their heads.... You will recall that the "off with their heads" scene in Alice is the one in which the Queen's lackeys were busily painting the white roses red.
5
posted on
02/01/2015 11:12:11 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
(Vote GOP for A Slower Handbasket)
To: george76
Warmists are getting angrier....
....And Leon's getting laaaarger.
6
posted on
02/01/2015 11:13:41 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: george76
Climate Change Believers apparently have never heard of
Bonini's Paradox, which states that the very complex simulations do not work due to the complexity and interaction of the various parts of the simulation. So, the more complex you make a simulation (ie. weather, in this case), the less accurate the model becomes.
Conversely, a simple model seldom works well, due to the fact that it doesn't take into consideration the various components that the actual system has in it.
Weathermen cannot accurately predict the weather more than 3 days into the future - yet we are to believe that these same programs, on these same machines can actually predict the weather 10, 50 or 100 years in the future.
7
posted on
02/01/2015 11:14:04 AM PST
by
Hodar
(A man can fail many times, but he isn't a failure until he begins to blame somebody else.- Burroughs)
To: george76
Application of the cult model is quite appropriate in characterizing the global warming alarmists. They are what Eric Hoffer termed "true believers," persons so ego-involved that they cannot process information discrepant from their own narrow tunnel vision. Add financial incentive, and you have hard core brain-lock.
To: Steely Tom
Yes, I saw them too.
What do they mean?
9
posted on
02/01/2015 11:20:44 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(The Gruber Revelations are proof that God is still smiling on America.)
To: george76
10
posted on
02/01/2015 11:22:02 AM PST
by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: george76
"
WarmistsClimatenazis getting angrier"
There. Fixed it.
To: george76
Their anger would be much more enjoyable if they hadn’t destroyed so much of what makes America different from the rest of the world.
Just one of tens of thousands, look at our cars. Not much more than lemon drops on wheels, and we used to have some of the most beautiful vehicles man could dream of.
No wonder driving is becoming a lost passion.
12
posted on
02/01/2015 11:27:37 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(The Gruber Revelations are proof that God is still smiling on America.)
To: Steely Tom
IIRC, “whinge” is the old school British predecessor of “whine”.
“tosme” looks familiar, but I can’t place it at all.
To: rktman
Bed wetting Alarmist is still better and more accurate.
14
posted on
02/01/2015 11:31:25 AM PST
by
IDFbunny
To: Hodar
“Weathermen cannot accurately predict the weather more than 3 days into the future - yet we are to believe that these same programs, on these same machines can actually predict the weather 10, 50 or 100 years in the future.”
Indeed. And the 3-day limit on weather prediction has been mathematically proven using chaos theory. Would love to see someone do the same thing with so-called “climate change” and publish the results. Should be easy enough to do for an adept chaos theorist.
15
posted on
02/01/2015 11:40:10 AM PST
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Calvin Locke
tosme looks familiar, but I cant place it at all.
Had me stumped for a while, dictionaries were no help, and then I realized it's just a typo for "some."
16
posted on
02/01/2015 11:41:13 AM PST
by
Colinsky
To: catnipman
Chaos theory just as relevant to climate predictions as it is to weather.
17
posted on
02/01/2015 12:13:11 PM PST
by
IDFbunny
To: george76
18
posted on
02/01/2015 12:14:05 PM PST
by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
To: Steely Tom
“tosme” looks like a misspelling of “some”.
“Whinge” is a perfectly cromulent word, meaning to complain in an irritating way.
19
posted on
02/01/2015 12:27:49 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Calvin Locke; Steely Tom
“tosme” looks like a typo of “to some”.
I actually use the word “whinge” on accasion.
20
posted on
02/01/2015 12:44:00 PM PST
by
Don W
(When blacks riot, neighborhoods and cities burn. When whites riot, nations and continents burn.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson