Posted on 02/11/2015 6:09:17 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie
U.S. Embassy Marines in Yemen handed over their M-9 pistols and M-4 carbines before evacuating the chaotic country with diplomatic personnel, the Pentagon said Wednesday.
The Marines also left behind several vehicles at the airport in the capital city of Sanaa before departing on a civilian flight, said Army Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman.
(Excerpt) Read more at military.com ...
Above all, in the middle east, respect is given to the strong horse. IT IS ALL ABOUT SAVING FACE! Who is responsible for this?
Just a few months ago, Yemen was touted as being an example of sucess in the struggle against violent extremists.
Departing on a CIVILIAN flight? If we were evacuating an Embassy, wouldn’t a rational CIC send in a contingent with military aircraft to transport the embassy staff? (rhetorical question)
How many guesses do I get?
Was this another move to further weaken the US military in the eyes of the Islamists in the Middle East and weaken our influence, I wonder. It sounds just like something the Obama team would do.
“Warren also could not say why a civilian charter flight was used rather than military aircraft for the evacuation. He suggested that the handover of weapons may have resulted from international rules barring weapons on a civilian flight.”
I call bullshit. My NG unit deployed to Korea multiple times while carrying weapons on board a civilian chartered flight. We had pistols, M60’s, M16’s, M48’s (three M16’s ductaped together).
Marines were ordered to evacuate with tails between their legs. Humiliation. Whos bright idea?
In the middle east, especially, respect is given to the strong horse. It is all about face and saving face. This is a terrible defeat, even though no shots were fired. It is all about perception.
Couldnt an honorable evacuation have been arranged?
This ain’t the 1950s
That’s what you do when you want to be inclusive, multicultural, and diverse. That’s also how you get locked in a cage, doused with gasoline, and set on fire. You get what you ask for.
BS, alright. 3 combat deployments since 2004. All of them utilized chartered civilian aircraft. Carried weapons each time.
Without arms, what was to prevent the Muzzies from grabbing the Marines and Embassy staff, putting them in a cage, and setting them all alight?
The Marines and Navy had an evacuation force just off shore. What was wrong with bringing them in for support and supervising the evacuation?
This would have been the honorable way to evacuate. Had anyone tested our Marines by firing on them, there would have been hell to pay (assuming the Marines were allowed to carry ammunition). It would have sent a message you do not screw around with Sam.
I presume the administration did not want to have video of a Saigon Embassy type evacuation, so they were willing to have the Marines humiliated as the lesser of two evils.
This action is very dangerous because it gives the idea that Marines now just put down their weapons and leave when confronted.
More Islamic Victory provided by Caliph 0bama.
Who gave the order?
L
Obama disarmament the military. No surprise there.
Disarms.
President just touted Yemen a few days ago as one of best allies and an example of success.
The State Department is not found in the Marine Corps chain of command.
L
What? One of those big Sea Kings with a Cobra escort couldn’t sit down on the grounds, load everyone up, arms and all, and take them away to an awaiting amphibious assault ship?
I agree. Surrendering weapons was a disaster waiting to happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.