Cute talk proposing dastardly and exceedingly dangerous policies that betray his allegiance to Islam above allegiance to our nation and the security of its citizens.
Silly? Then he will really be amused by the debate if he ever presents to the US Senate the “historic agreement” he is “negotiating” with Iran. However Obama will never present it to the Senate. Instead he’ll get the UN Security Council to endorse it and then claim the US is bound by “international law”. Obama views himself as a “world citizen” and despite the constitution and sovereignty of the United States, beleives the UN takes precedent.
“These terrorists are desperate for legitimacy and all us have a responsibility to refute the notion that groups like ISIL somehow represent Islam, because that is a falsehood.”
Where is the separation between church and state and when did a US President feel it is his duty and right to define and promote a religion? ISIS is a threat to this nation, that is all he needs to be concerned with, instead he is minimizing and excusing the threat by making it a religious debate. I don’t think he can do this.
If the regime had a plan, it wouldn’t matter what they called them. The media debate about names is just fluff to avoid the fact that they have no plan.
ISIS already has a name, they gave it to themselves. Kill them all.
Wow; Obama is using an acronym to refer to an acronym. How convoluted and mysterious.
Oh how the profession of journalism has fallen since it has become the Profession of Journalism.
Silly? Then he will really be amused by the debate if he ever presents to the US Senate the “historic agreement” he is “negotiating” with Iran. However Obama will never present it to the Senate. Instead he’ll get the UN Security Council to endorse it and then claim the US is bound by “international law”. Obama views himself as a “world citizen” and despite the constitution and sovereignty of the United States, beleives the UN takes precedent.