Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blueunicorn6; All

“Why? It was a surprise attack, wasn’t it? Why couldn’t they just say the terrorists hit us in Benghazi?”

Simple. They were afraid that it might cost them a point or two in the election.

In Hillary’s case, she knew that she had denied beefing up security in Benghazi, so she could blow the funds on favors to friends on the continent.

She was concerned that it would make her look bad as well.

Guess what. It does, it did, and she looks far, far, worse than if she had done the right thing.


32 posted on 02/26/2015 5:09:43 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

The Democrats use of the video can only be put forth as an excuse as to WHY the attack occurred. It can not be used as an excuse for why Hillary didn’t provide the proper security in Benghazi. She didn’t use the video as an excuse to release her from her negligence in not securing things in Benghazi. So what was it that she was trying to excuse?

She was trying to excuse and cover up the REAL reason for the attack in Benghazi. Big, big difference.


33 posted on 02/26/2015 7:06:08 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson