Judge approves settlement allowing return of some Mexicans expelled from California

Rueters ^ | 2-28-15 | Marty Graham

[artichokegrower]

A court ruling clears the way for hundreds and perhaps thousands of immigrants improperly expelled to Mexico from Southern California to be allowed to return to seek legal U.S. residency, an official with a civil rights group said on Saturday

[artichokegrower]

So these folks initial relationship with our country is to ignore its laws but then when they feel abused they turn to our legal system. Go figure.

"One of our plaintiffs is a mom who was detained with her 11-year-old son, a U.S. citizen who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome,"

So she illegally entered our country, had a baby at our expense, that baby is by some antiquated law a citizen and now we have to support her and her child forever.

[lowbridge]

Bump

[Vigilanteman]

She correctly figured out that our legal system is rigged to favor her against mere U.S. citizens.

[FlingWingFlyer]

“Judges” are America’s top criminals these days. They ALL should be arrested and thrown in jail. Maggots from foreign countries come here, break our laws and the black robed, sexal deviant tyrants provide protection for them. What this “judge” is doing is illegal. He/she/it has broken the law and should be arrested for aiding and abetting foreign criminals. He/she/it then should be forced to cut his/her/its own lawn and clean his/her/its own house.

[Baladas]

and the ACLU ought to change their name to the MCLU.

[artichokegrower]

1/3 of all adults and 1/2 of all children in California are covered by Medi-Cal. It’s not sustainable.

[familyop]

"So she illegally entered our country, had a baby at our expense, that baby is by some antiquated law a citizen and now we have to support her and her child forever."

It's only one of the earlier consequences of government-linked bosses using foreigners as slaves. The later consequences can be humdingers. The Fourteenth Amendment was one of the Reconstruction Amendments.

United States Constitution

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

[familyop]

And the rest of the info from the article on the mother and son...

"'One of our plaintiffs is a mom who was detained with her 11-year-old son, a U.S. citizen who suffers from Asperger's Syndrome,' Castro said. 'She was told her son would be put into foster care if she didn't agree to sign the papers.'"

There is no mention of whether or not she or another household member are employed. Interesting, though. What if she is employed? With nearly 100 million American adults out of work, what would be the most likely source of her income?

Heavy Hitters: Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2014
http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.php
American Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,949,129 [Democrat] 81% [Republican] 1%”
National Cmte to Preserve Social Security & Medicare $10,414,606 [Democrat] 82% [Republican] 17%

Leviathan (Uncle Sam employs more people than you think)
National Review ^ | 02/03/2011 | Iain Murray
"...nearly 40 million Americans employed in some way by government."

[artichokegrower]

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States
Therein lies the rub. Mexican citizens in the United States are not subject to the political jurisdiction thereof. A Mexican can get a speeding ticket but not be charged with treason.

[familyop]

Unless they’re U.S. citizens.