In February, MNS obtained a document called the "Instructional Teaching Load Template" for 11 of the 13 UW System 4 year institutions through publicly available sources. This spreadsheet contains information for the 2014 school year including the names of all instructors, the number of credits each one taught, the classes they taught, the number of students in each class, and a break down of their position's funding source.
MNS filed open records requests with UW-Madison and UW-Milwaukee to obtain similar records from those institutions. At the end of the month, however, both schools responded that they are unable to fulfill the requests. - "Two campuses - the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee - do not keep centralized records of individual instructor teaching loads similar to all other schools in the system, according to open records requests filed by the MacIver News Service.
In February, MNS obtained a document called the "Instructional Teaching Load Template" for 11 of the 13 UW System 4 year institutions through publicly available sources. This spreadsheet contains information for the 2014 school year including the names of all instructors, the number of credits each one taught, the classes they taught, the number of students in each class, and a break down of their position's funding source.
MNS filed open records requests with UW-Madison and UW-Milwaukee to obtain similar records from those institutions. At the end of the month, however, both schools responded that they are unable to fulfill the requests.".......
Here in my state, the university system is governed by a Board of Regents - serving in that position largely at the pleasure of the state governor.
Walker needs to think about restructuring his system like this if it isn’t already the case. Universities do not exist for the convenience of academics. They are supposed to provide a service. If they can’t do that, then they should be reformed or replaced with those who will.
More than 80 Percent of the UW System Surplus is Unrestricted
[Madison, Wisc...] The University of Wisconsin System may face harsh questioning from legislators following the release of a report by the Legislative Audit Bureau (LAB), which shows the university system's reserves grew at a very fast pace over the past decade.
Members of the Joint Committee on Finance (JFC) will be given that chance at the UW System's budget briefing on Tuesday morning. Every state agency testifies in front of JFC at the beginning of the budget process to explain their requests.
The UW System is expected to brief JFC at a hearing on Tuesday beginning at 9am.
While it is expected that UW officials will fight back against a $150 million cut in each year of the budget, a review of LAB's report and Legislative Fiscal Bureau (LFB) documents shows the UW System still maintains rather large Program Revenue (PR) balances.
During the budget debate two years ago, members of the CPA Caucus discovered the UW System had a balance of more than $1 billion. That so-called "slush fund" was made up of PR balances.
Two years later, the UW System's PR balance has grown from $1.05 billion to $1.19 billion. However, UW officials have claimed large portions of the balance are now earmarked for specific projects, so they claim it is technically not surplus.
In the last 10 years, it has grown significantly. The UW System PR balance has increased from $268.2 million to $1.19 billion - more than four times the size it was in 2004-05.
The UW slush fund has also grown at a much faster rate than the system's budget. In 2004-05, the PR balance was the equivalent of 6.9 percent of the UW System's overall budget of $3.88 billion. In 2013-14 the PR balance was equal to 19.8 percent of the system's $6 billion budget.
However, it grew even more when matched up to the UW System's general program operations (GPO) budget. When compared to UW's GPO budget, the PR balance grew from 16.3 percent in 2004-05 to 54.1 percent in 2013-14.
Even with the sudden increase in PR balances - many of which were supposed to be spent down after the discovery of the slush fund in 2013 - UW officials continue to say the much of the funds are restricted.".......
In state tuition is about $10,500; out of state $26,500. In state - about right for in-state tuition for a state school (especially for such a good school); out of state tuition is very cheap compared with similar state schools (by at least $10,000 a year).
Now I know why so many from my state (not Wisconsin) try to go there. Real bargain.
Stop complaining! End tenure. Costs will drop and quality of teaching will soar.
Our previous governor Jim Doyle took 3$B of the transportation fund created from gasoline taxes and used to maintain infastructure and diverted that to cover WEAC Wisconsin Education (teacher’s union) and other state pension programs. During the Walker recall election a petition for a constitutuional amendment to prevent such diversions passed and came into effect last year.
That’s never brought up now and don’t know why it isn’t. Because it should.
Needless to say our roads weren’t maintained and infastructure was left crumbling .It also left the state scurrying for funds from every nook and cranny to fix the roads and bridges.
Looks like a feeding frenzy of a bunch of people who want to bite the hand that feeds them! They do not like the idea of "adult supervision," long overdue.
I certainly understand the chronic need for more money, lower tuition, and more autonomy by the recipients of public monies. Walker must be onto something good and something big!