Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bengazi Committee & the Hillary Clinton Emails ... Cont’d
National Review ^ | 3/9/2015 | Andrew C. McCarthy

Posted on 03/09/2015 5:54:23 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross

A journalist informed me this morning that a source close to Congressman Trey Gowdy (R., S.C.) and the House’s select committee on the Benghazi terrorist attack, which Mr. Gowdy chairs, has responded to points raised in my weekend column.

In the column, I expressed surprise and disappointment that, while Chairman Gowdy by his own account learned about Secretary of State Clinton’s use of private email over six months ago, the committee took no meaningful responsive action: It did not reveal that alarming information publicly, issue subpoenas for those emails, or issue preservation letters to the relevant telecommunication service providers to retain records.

The source close to Gowdy and the committee reports that the State Department only recently told the committee that Secretary Clinton exclusively used ‎personal email. The source says that once the committee learned that State never had her emails to begin with, “the circumstances changed hence the subpoena directly to her.” The source adds that this is why Chairman Gowdy, in a Sunday appearance on Face the Nation, said he’s lost confidence in the State Department.

This is what I told the journalist who asked for my reaction:

Chairman Gowdy says he is running the committee like a prosecutor conducting a meticulous investigation. When a prosecutor learns that a subject of his investigation is using private email, he issues a subpoena forthwith. From the investigator’s standpoint, whether the use of private email is occasional or exclusive does not affect his responsibility — his job is to obtain the evidence.

I’m relieved to hear that Chairman Gowdy has lost confidence in the State Department, but that begs the question why he had confidence in the first place. State has a history of withholding and misrepresenting information about Benghazi. In fact, [as I noted in my column,] the week Chairman Gowdy held his first Benghazi hearing, a witness [whom the committee did not call at the hearing] came forward to say that he’d seen Secretary Clinton’s top aides removing documents from what was supposed to be disclosed to Clinton’s hand-picked Accountability Review Board.

So if the chairman continued to have confidence in the State Department’s transparency in this particular matter, that is baffling. But that is almost beside the point. The State Department is a subject of the investigation that Mr. Gowdy says he is conducting like a meticulous prosecutor. A prosecutor does not rely on the good graces of the subjects of his investigation to produce evidence. He uses his subpoena power.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: andymccarthy; benghazi; gowdy; gowdysbc; hillaryemails; hillaryemailserver; libya; selectcommittee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
A follow up article related to yesterday's thread on Trey Gowdy's Benghazi Committee.
1 posted on 03/09/2015 5:54:23 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

McCarthy for AG!


2 posted on 03/09/2015 5:58:31 AM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Ms. Lindsay and her BF John also involved in Benghazi and prevailed on Gowdey to confine investigation to mere TV drama...?


3 posted on 03/09/2015 6:02:24 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

The use of the private email was not a “warning light” when first know, Mr. McCarthy. The presence of ms. hitlery’s own web server in her home with the capability of erasing any and all emails.... permanently... WAS a warning buzzer and reason for a subpoena.

The server of last resort is the NSA which has ALL of hitlery’s emails... whether she erased them or not at her server. And this is where this case may have to go.

Clintons are complete utter facile liars and grifters— all of them.


4 posted on 03/09/2015 6:03:18 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary was famously seen here Oct 8, 2011, on an official trip to
Libya---working her Blackberry. Yet, no emails from that day
were turned over to the House Benghazi Committee.

Photo: Reuters

GOWDY: “It strains credibility to believe that if you’re on your way to Libya to discuss US Libyan foreign policy, that there’s not a single document turned over to Congress."

Gowdy has requested emails related to Libya, before, during, and after, the attack that killed four Americans.

=================================================

INCONVENIENT FACTOID---Hillary was Secy of State for 1460 days.....and " supposedly" turned over 55,000 pages...

But, but........ Marie Harf said that was a "big number."

Who you gonna believe? A bodacious blonde bimbo? Or the cold, hard facts?

5 posted on 03/09/2015 6:09:52 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

I second the motion!


6 posted on 03/09/2015 6:12:53 AM PDT by FES0844
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Well I’m glad that McCarthy’s column got the attention of Gowdy. Fairly weak response at this point though. And via a journalist?


7 posted on 03/09/2015 6:14:00 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Just so we remember, Gowdy’s committee includes

Elijah Cummings, Maryland, Ranking Member
Adam Smith, Washington
Adam Schiff, California
Linda Sánchez, California
Tammy Duckworth, Illinois

Gowdy is NOT a prosecutor. He knows almost nothing that isn’t known by the Dem members, and if the Dem members know it, so does Hillary and Obama.


8 posted on 03/09/2015 6:14:07 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

When was the last time A DEMOCRAT went to jail based on the results of a Congressional investigation?? What did Daryl Issa accomplish?? All the hand waving and pontificating has just resulted in the overpowering smell of fish....

AND NO RESULTS FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, in spite of these Congressional investigative clowns being buried in criminals.


9 posted on 03/09/2015 6:14:20 AM PDT by EagleUSA (Liberalism removes the significance of everything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis

Much as I like McCarthy, I think he’s a little out in left field on this one. Almost everyone in the world has a private email account, and can rent a personal domain name for ten bucks a year. I have half a dozen (all but one of which I hardly ever use). I also have no significant, if any, business emails on my private accounts. The key issue here is that Hillary had her own SERVER, and had NO State Department account. The key to me is when did Gowdy find out this information, not when did he find out Hillary had a private email address.


10 posted on 03/09/2015 6:15:43 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (The Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Adam Schiff, California? I thought he was the NY DA in Law and Order...:)


11 posted on 03/09/2015 6:21:45 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

The reason it got Gowdy’s attention is that it was McCarthy who penned it. The great thing about McCarthy being on the trail is that it might force, or at least pressure, Gowdy to go further in this thing than Boehner / Graham, etc, have instructed him to.


12 posted on 03/09/2015 6:22:59 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

13 posted on 03/09/2015 6:24:21 AM PDT by CptnObvious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

“Hillary was Secy of State for 1460 days.....and “ supposedly” turned over 55,000 pages...”

And that 55k pages only contained 300 emails.

Does anyone believe she only sent/received 1 email a week?


14 posted on 03/09/2015 6:25:54 AM PDT by Beagle8U (NOTICE : Unattended children will be given Coffee and a Free Puppy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

thanks for the clarification


15 posted on 03/09/2015 6:31:38 AM PDT by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
The reason it got Gowdy’s attention is that it was McCarthy who penned it. The great thing about McCarthy being on the trail is that it might force, or at least pressure, Gowdy to go further in this thing than Boehner / Graham, etc, have instructed him to.

Yes. Though Gowdy is not now a prosecutor, he clearly harbors the conceit that he still has prosecutorial chops. That McCarthy is casting an unimpressed eye upon his efforts can only work to up Gowdy's game - a good thing.

16 posted on 03/09/2015 6:35:25 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
I am not sure about McCain and Lindsey involvement to hold down the select committee, but we know that leadership in the house and senate knew of the “gun running” from Libya to Syria. It is no coincident that Mike Rogers abruptly announced he would not seek re-election. His wife I recall is involved with a contractor connected to the gun running.
17 posted on 03/09/2015 6:39:58 AM PDT by 11th Commandment ("THOSE WHO TIRE LOSE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Gowdy is NOT a prosecutor.

Not sure what you mean by that. His claim to fame prior to Congress was as a Fed prosecutor. He was chosen for this seat precisely because of that experience. He questions very much like a prosecutor, and harkens back to that in his questioning as well. Can you clarify?

18 posted on 03/09/2015 6:47:36 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
"Deny! Deny! Deny! ...We Did NOT Create I.S.I.S. ...Got it!"


19 posted on 03/09/2015 6:54:37 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

He is the Chairman of a bipartisan committee. His job is to write a report, not get indictments. There are a couple Democrats on that committee that have been prosecutors too.

Hearings like these usually involve the witness being given the questions ahead of time and writing answers to them ahead of time, mostly not even under oath. Anyone know if that’s the case here?

Gowdy needs to be upfront about that instead of pretending like he’s doing something when the boss (media and public) look in.


20 posted on 03/09/2015 6:59:38 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson