To: GOPJ
Problem here is according to our laws Hillary doesn't have to answer a single question Gowdy wants to ask. She doesn't have to incriminate herself. I like the guy (he's my favorite to listen to)... but at the end of the day, he needs to have her indicted or he needs to move along. She doesn't have to answer his questions, and she doesn't have to testify at her trial.
The fact he's being stonewalled by the state department is irrelevant to me. Indict the witch and convict her, or go do something else. If the state department is stonewalling him, then indict them too. But quit crying about them not giving him all the answers.
The video at the site is really old. Its time for him to get it done.
67 posted on
03/09/2015 7:50:53 PM PDT by
kjam22
(my music video "If My People" at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74b20RjILy4)
To: kjam22
The fact he's being stonewalled by the state department is irrelevant to me. Indict the witch and convict her, or go do something else. If the state department is stonewalling him, then indict them too. But quit crying about them not giving him all the answers.Congressmen do not have the power to indict people.
Cordially,
71 posted on
03/09/2015 8:07:07 PM PDT by
Diamond
(He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
To: kjam22
The country needs to know Hillary... the press won’t vet a democrat so Gowdy can do their job for them.
79 posted on
03/09/2015 8:42:43 PM PDT by
GOPJ
(Obama on Hillary: "I did not have TEXT with that woman"... Freeper hoosiermama)
To: kjam22
Problem here is according to our laws Hillary doesn't have to answer a single question Gowdy wants to ask. She doesn't have to incriminate herself. Can't a Congressionally-sibpoena'd witness be granted immunity, thus removing the risk of self-recrimination, and then be compelled to testify?
Haven't things like that been done before?
83 posted on
03/09/2015 9:00:58 PM PDT by
sargon
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson