To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
Technically true but misleading statment by WaPo reporter. He doesn’t mention that Senate has to approve by 2/3 vote.
Ping to Today show list.
2 posted on
03/10/2015 8:42:23 AM PDT by
governsleastgovernsbest
(FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Save that picture for the ‘useful idiot’ file.
3 posted on
03/10/2015 8:44:27 AM PDT by
tgusa
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Technically true but misleading statment by WaPo reporter. He doesn’t mention that Senate has to approve by 2/3 vote.
Why do we need a senate when we have an EMPEROR!
4 posted on
03/10/2015 8:44:39 AM PDT by
GraceG
(Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Technically, the Constitution says something on the order of “....the President has the power to make...., with 2/3 of the advise and consent (required)....”
This ‘ratification’ business is superfluous add-on diversion.
10 posted on
03/10/2015 8:54:40 AM PDT by
Gaffer
To: governsleastgovernsbest
President can sign a treaty, but it does not take effect until ratified by the Senate.
16 posted on
03/10/2015 9:12:57 AM PDT by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
“All constitutional experts agree that it is the President who ratifies treaties....” -— Statement by Barack Obama, planned for March 11, 2015
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson