Including the last sentence of part two? The jury found the Kyle fabricated the incident. No one is contesting that finding.
It is couched in legal phasing but yes they are contesting that finding. They are saying the judges instructions and answers to questions caused them to make the wrong decision.
just because a third parties contend the fine was excessive even if what Kyle wrote was false is not the same as saying it was false
I can get accused of stealing a piece of candy and get sentenced to 10 years.....
If anything the excessive fine in the end argues for a bias jury in the first place Other can then certainly arguing in court that 10 years for stealing a piece of candy is cruel excessive punishment ....
Along with me making an appeal I didn't steal the candy and the jury found wrong..
Or do you content all jurors are never wrong?