Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yarddog

Including the last sentence of part two? The jury found the Kyle fabricated the incident. No one is contesting that finding.


13 posted on 03/10/2015 8:22:42 PM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: SubMareener

It is couched in legal phasing but yes they are contesting that finding. They are saying the judges instructions and answers to questions caused them to make the wrong decision.


15 posted on 03/10/2015 8:28:42 PM PDT by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: SubMareener
The last two sentence are a statement by Ventura attorney.. and nowhere in the article does it state “No one is contesting that finding”. .

just because a third parties contend the fine was excessive even if what Kyle wrote was false is not the same as saying it was false

I can get accused of stealing a piece of candy and get sentenced to 10 years.....

If anything the excessive fine in the end argues for a bias jury in the first place Other can then certainly arguing in court that 10 years for stealing a piece of candy is cruel excessive punishment ....

Along with me making an appeal I didn't steal the candy and the jury found wrong..

Or do you content all jurors are never wrong?

24 posted on 03/10/2015 9:00:06 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson