Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry says Congress cannot modify any Iran-U.S. nuclear agreement
Reuters via Yahoo ^ | 3/11 | Reuters

Posted on 03/11/2015 9:47:21 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Wednesday lawmakers cannot modify any nuclear agreement struck between the United States and Iran despite threats by Republican senators that they can.

In congressional testimony, Kerry said he responded with "utter disbelief" at an open letter signed by 47 Republican senators that threatened to undo any nuclear agreement reached between Tehran and Washington.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; irandeal; islamicbomb; johnkerry; lurch; proliferation; pruneface; treaties; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
I'm not fluent in this area of law, but I suspect Kerry is probably more correct than the 47. At least partly. If the US signs an "agreement" which amounts to a treaty that includes 5 or 6 other countries, it will be pretty difficult to sever ourselves from that agreement with only the involvement of the US Congress. And even if we did manage to sever ourselves, that likely wouldn't nullify the agreement.
1 posted on 03/11/2015 9:47:21 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Reject. Do not modify, That the Senate can do.


2 posted on 03/11/2015 9:49:25 AM PDT by BigEdLB (We're experienceing the rule of a Roman Emperor, Barack I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

So the Yalta Agreement wasn’t ratified by Congress?


3 posted on 03/11/2015 9:49:36 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

4 posted on 03/11/2015 9:49:52 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

why the long face John?


5 posted on 03/11/2015 9:50:27 AM PDT by GotMojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB
Reject. Do not modify, That the Senate can do.

Treaty, yes. Executive agreement, no.

6 posted on 03/11/2015 9:50:39 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Excuse me a moment......

F U J K

Thank you.


7 posted on 03/11/2015 9:51:19 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Congress can’t modify any agreement but Congress can fund or not fund, make legal or make illegal the observing of terms of that agreement. If it is not a Treaty then it is nothing binding on Congress. It is just what 2 heads of state agreed to. Congress can’t change their agreement but Congress can determine what will be done or not done about the agreement.


8 posted on 03/11/2015 9:51:21 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Perhaps the Senators’ letter will serve to give the other so-called “partners” cause for reflection.


9 posted on 03/11/2015 9:51:40 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

And King Obie waved his imperial scepter, and lo, the pesky congress was dissolved.


10 posted on 03/11/2015 9:51:47 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue
it will be pretty difficult to sever ourselves

Unless the US Senat, by 2/3 majority, ratifies the treaty ...

WE AREN'T BOUND BY IT IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!!

There's no "severing" to do.

11 posted on 03/11/2015 9:52:13 AM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121
So the Yalta Agreement wasn’t ratified by Congress?

No. Neither were the agreements that came out of Quebec, Casablanca, Teheran, or Potsdam.

12 posted on 03/11/2015 9:52:49 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Elephant in the room: Why is the secret Muslim doing this behind Congress' back?

13 posted on 03/11/2015 9:53:46 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue
Kerry says Congress cannot modify any Iran-U.S. nuclear agreement,

Watch us, biotch.

You break the law all the time, we will too.

14 posted on 03/11/2015 9:54:58 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The FCC takeover of the internet will quickly become a means to censorship of dissent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain

That’s an interesting point.


15 posted on 03/11/2015 9:55:07 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Kerry, a horse, and Hillary walk into a bar

and the bartender say’s “this some kind of joke?”


16 posted on 03/11/2015 9:55:58 AM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

The 1799 Logan Act, which says starkly:

“Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Has intercourse with another government?? Good thing Clinton never saw that. I think this letter was a dumb move and a big waste of time.


17 posted on 03/11/2015 9:56:12 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Governor Tarkin: The Imperial Senate will no longer be of any concern to us. I have just received word that the Emperor has dissolved the council permanently. The last remnants of the Old Republic have been swept away forever.
General Tagge: But that’s impossible! How will the Emperor maintain control without the bureaucracy?
Governor Tarkin: The regional governors now have direct control over their territories. Fear will keep the local systems in line.


18 posted on 03/11/2015 9:57:22 AM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

Don’t worry, the republician in the...Oh, wait...We’re screwed!!


19 posted on 03/11/2015 9:57:26 AM PDT by Duckdog (If it wasn't for NASCAR my TV would have gone out the window years ago!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Article 2 Section 2 does not prevent such a letter, nor does it state what steps must or must not be taken or procedure used in determining whether or not consent is to be given.


20 posted on 03/11/2015 10:00:09 AM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson