Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Al-Aqsa Mosque Tells Pakistan: Nuke The West
Truth Revolt ^ | March 16,, 2015 | Jeff Dunetz |

Posted on 03/17/2015 6:46:08 PM PDT by QT3.14

Oh army of Pakistan, you are a nuclear army. Why do some generals, who have the ability to change history with one swift blow, refrain from doing so? They have nuclear weapons.

Muslim clerics inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque atop the Temple Mount in Jerusalem are not simply teaching hatred against the Jews or Israel. Many of their attacks are directed against the entire Western World. The clip above, published and translated by MEMRI, features parts of two speeches given by Sheik Muhammad Abed, also known as Abu Abdallah, which means father of Allah's slave, an alias used by several Islamist leaders including Usama bin Laden.

(Excerpt) Read more at truthrevolt.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abed; alaqsamosaque; islamicbomb; mohammadabed; nuclear; nuke; nukes; pakistan; templemount; terrorthreat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 03/17/2015 6:46:08 PM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

From what I’ve been informed of regarding Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, we (the US) control their security. At least that was about ten years ago.


2 posted on 03/17/2015 6:49:05 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

If Pakistan attacks the west with nuclear weapons, then the Muslim population of the world will be decreased by two-hundred million.


3 posted on 03/17/2015 6:51:14 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

If they aren’t on US soil saying we control them is farcical. US Navy warships excepted.


4 posted on 03/17/2015 6:51:16 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

At one point we had a physical presence in Pakistan which guarded their nukes. Say as you may.


5 posted on 03/17/2015 6:55:15 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Obama wouldn’t retaliate with nukes but Bibi would.


6 posted on 03/17/2015 6:55:23 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

The current paki leadership is not insanely hateful like these sheiks. Nor are they suicidal. However there is always the risk that more unpredictable forces will take power. If I were CiC I would have a permanent boomer station off the coast of pakistan, and all paki nukes pre-targeted.


7 posted on 03/17/2015 6:56:24 PM PDT by matt1234 (2015-2016 America's enemies sense obama's weakness and strike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/18/washington/18nuke.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


8 posted on 03/17/2015 6:56:59 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

“At one point we had a physical presence in Pakistan which guarded their nukes. Say as you may.”

Unless that physical presence is greater than a Division it’s less than a popcorn fart.

L


9 posted on 03/17/2015 6:58:53 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Oh Great, somebody else wants to be first when Obama Surrenders.


10 posted on 03/17/2015 6:59:32 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

The muslim nuke.

Obama wants a world with zero nuclear weapons. However,instead of disabling the bad guys’s weapons programs he seeks to bring our arsenal and development programs to ZERO.


11 posted on 03/17/2015 7:01:00 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45

Speaking of nukes, some cancers need to be treated with radiation. Islam is one of them.


12 posted on 03/17/2015 7:01:29 PM PDT by QT3.14 (GRUBER - HARK 2016 /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

Not a matter of when, but which city is hit first?


13 posted on 03/17/2015 7:02:20 PM PDT by deadrock (I is someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

The Pakis have about 120 warheads. Their longest range missile can go about 1700 miles. Excellent for hitting targets in India. Not very effective for attacking USA.


14 posted on 03/17/2015 7:02:45 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Code gremlins too. We did it to the entire ship load of missiles the NORKS sold to Syria. Our special forces did a little code rewriting and downloaded it. They all blow up real good about 15 seconds after launch.


15 posted on 03/17/2015 7:02:53 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

What’s their delivery system, besides boats?


16 posted on 03/17/2015 7:04:20 PM PDT by MaxMax (Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45; blackdog
The nukes in Paki are locked up tighter than a bulls ass in fly time.

First things the Pakis learnt about having nukes was that having nukes was worse than not having nukes.

17 posted on 03/17/2015 7:04:42 PM PDT by onona (Obama's entire term reads like a John Semmens post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: QT3.14

18 posted on 03/17/2015 7:04:50 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

That’s great if they put them on a missile. What if they put them in shipping containers or commercial aircraft?


19 posted on 03/17/2015 7:05:24 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
"Unless that physical presence is greater than a Division it’s less than a popcorn fart."

Which is exactly why cyber warfare is so much more effective with high technology weapons defense.

Of course as for low tech rag heads with Toyota's and RPG's lopping people's heads off for reading Sports Illustrated? That's another matter all together.

20 posted on 03/17/2015 7:08:06 PM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson