I don’t know about anyone else , but I certainly admire her ‘sticktoittiveness’.
Online law degree and time on her hands.
Received below email today. Is this what she is referencing?
Is this legit?
Subject: Subject: SSN 042-68-4425”
For those of you who don’t know but at the very bottom of this article the attorney who authored this article is John Wayne’s daughter, Aissa Wayne, also a USC graduate.
Well, Well, Well, it looks like someone thoroughly checked this out! I was wondering who was going to do research into President
Obama’s Social Security number.
Jean Paul Luwig or Barack Hussein Obama? SSN#042-68-4425
WOW, read this, it’s short - very interesting.
An intensive 6-year investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security Number (SSN) is being used by President Obama.
Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, immigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (President Obama’s current SSN) rec’d on or about March 1977.
Mr. Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut . Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.
Barack H. Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!
Now comes the best part! J. P. Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.
Conveniently, Obama ‘s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham,worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.
The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.
The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. Citizen, either because he was born in Kenya, or became a citizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro, simply scoured the probate records, until she found someone, who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for her grandson Barry Obama.
Just wait until the head Birther himself, Donald Trump, gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O ‘s use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of
defending Obama.
Let ‘s all get this information out to everybody on our mailing lists. If the voters of this great nation can succeed in bringing this lying, deceitful, cheating, corrupt, impostor to justice it will be the biggest and best news in decades for our country and the world
If you can just say “oh well; ho hum” after reading this you get what you deserve .
“In God We Trust.”
Aissa Wayne
LAW OFFICES OF AISSA WAYNE
30765 P.C.H., Suite
203, Malibu , CA 90260
Tel : (310) 457-9999
Fax : (310) 457-0643
An ineligible President violates the Appointments Clause, U.S. CONST. art. II, § 2, cl. 2, with each appointment of a principle federal officer.
The Founders authored the Appointments Clause as a safeguard for the separation of powers. The Supreme Court has stated “that we must examine the language of Art. II, § 2, cl. 2” in the context of separation of the powers. Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. at 124–25. It has also acknowledged that “[t]he roots of the separation-of-powers concept embedded in the Appointments Clause are structural and political.” Freytag v. Comm’r, 501 U.S. at 878.
The Appointments Clause requires all “Officers” to be appointed by (1) by the President with Senate confirmation, (2) by the President alone, (3) by the Courts of Law, and (4) by the Heads of Departments.
A Department is defined as a “‘free-standing, self-contained
entity in the Executive Branch,’” such as the Department of the Treasury. Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Accounting Oversight Bd., 130 S. Ct. 3138 (2010) (quoting Freytag v. Comm’r, 501 U.S. at 915 (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment)). Therefore, the Secretary of the Treasury is a Department Head who may constitutionally appoint “inferior Officers” with statutory permission, whereas the Commissioner of the IRS is not.
I wonder if federal judges fight for the right to hear Orly Taitz cases, given their considerable comedic value, or if they fight to keep from having to hear Orly Taitz cases, given her lack of competence in legal matters?
Mark for later read and study.