PING!
So Gay Nanny State PING!
Where is an Orwell, Asimov, or Bradbury today writing about this?
HG Wells seems to have been a global socialist utopian so his voice doesn’t matter.
Percentage too high by twice
Not to defend queers in anyway, but, if after 9 years of serving this homosexual couple, wouldn’t it be somewhat natural for the homos to go to Arlene’s for the services they wanted for their marriage?
On the other hand, the queers should have respected her views and taken their business elsewhere.
Just say’n
Well-written and precisely to the point. It is important that we band together in the interest of freedom in general. This 3% needs promptly to be identified and “put out of business” as it were, for the simple reason their ideas are inimical to the Constitution. Let them live, but do not let them vote or hold public office unless or until the convert to the principles we all agree to live by.
This essay by Bethany Blankley in The Washington Times may serve to identify LG groups activism and also suggests by citing this legal case something personal happened between these two named litigants that could have faded away.
But when the God denying democrat (in name only) party seized it and promoted this into a doctrine of “political correctness” to serve their polical purposes . It clearly demonstrates that it was usefull to use in subduing the thorn of religion particularly Christian and we are now under attack.
Political sexuality, political islam, all about conquest and zero respect of representation, all browshirt barbarians.
Excellent op-ed! One thing though, from what I’ve read and seen in interviews with Barronelle Stuzman of Arlene’s Flowers, the Gay friend and customer of 9 years did not start all the fuss. Is was others in the local Gay community that did. She then retired after a time because it was simply that time to retire. She is a grandmother and great grandmother.
It is this type of coercion that caused patriots to band together to found a new nation against King George III.
I was thinking about the 3% today. I asked, “What are they really doing?” Everything they are doing is a counterfeiting of the man-woman experience. It is like some who buy those $6000 Real Dolls. Is there real fulfillment with a Real Doll? It is counterfeit, just like those who want sexual reassignment surgery. All of it is an effort to reproduce the real thing. In fact it denies them the real deal at the heart of it all: the opportunity to reproduce and partner with another person of the opposite sex, the product of their natural life. This denial takes them out of the gene pool (unless they donate their gametes for in vitro fertilization), into an artificial life as artificial as the Real Doll.
One must ask, why would one choose to cut themselves off from the full experience of ones humanity and be left with an artificial substitute? Can this be the a path to fulfillment?
I think this all happens in the formative years among ones peers. In those years, ones peers give signals, based upon their perceptions of you, that determine the path you will take. Those signals tell a person’s sexual identity and, ones social environment conditions them to conform to these signals. Their reproductive fate is sealed. Because of this, I think they are resentful of the role they must play that makes them choose an artificial substitution for reality.
The Christian Church offers them the choice of another reality, that of the spiritual world. It is the world of Christ’s sacrifice and resurrection. It promises to give spiritual healing of their shattered sexual identity and puts them on the right path towards redemption. This spiritual world might seem like another artificial substitution for reality. To those without spiritual awakening, it does. It appears like one more dead end path in search of fulfillment. Yet, that spiritual world they have so much hate, is the world they should have so much love. It is the way and the truth that has lit the way for mankind.
