To: detective
This sin comparison is ridiculous. Adulterers and other sinners don’t wear a sign on them, so a merchant can maintain neutrality. Not so in the case of SSM, which is in your face and forces you to either accept or reject.
2 posted on
04/08/2015 7:19:26 AM PDT by
Genoa
(Starve the beast.)
To: Genoa
The left hasn’t realized that by serving the adulterer is being non-judgmental, which is what they demand from us.
7 posted on
04/08/2015 7:24:58 AM PDT by
Wiser now
(Socialism does not eliminate poverty, it guarantees it.)
To: Genoa
That and most people aren’t proud of their sins. Most people don’t go into confession asking for a priest’s blessing to continue to steal, cheat on their wives, or beat their kids.
To: Genoa
And if an adulterer came in, said he wanted flowers for his mistress, the florist could very well deny him his services. These questions are stupid.
21 posted on
04/08/2015 7:54:12 AM PDT by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
To: Genoa
Yes I am a sinner, but I don't advertise my sins when I go shopping. Gays often flaunt their perversion. I don't care if somebody is gay, go pound all the fudge, or munch on all the carpet you want. At least have the decency to do it in private, and don't tell me about it later. Hell, I don't like seeing a man kissing a women in public. Your sex life is none of my damn business, keep it that way.
To: Genoa
How about asking if they would provide flowers, photography, cake for a Satanic ritual?
That seems like a more appropriate comparison.
35 posted on
04/08/2015 9:24:03 AM PDT by
joshua c
(Please dont feed the liberals)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson