Posted on 04/27/2015 7:07:15 AM PDT by rktman
Here’s an article, in where Dr. John R. Lott Jr., eviscerates Harvard Professor David Hemenway’s survey of cherry picked authors. That of course lead to the conclusion that guns are bad. It’s what these people do. No matter real credible research, and the longstanding Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which is an obvious social utility of the people.
I wonder why gun prohibitionists think the Second Amendment was created to begin with. It’s in the Bill of Rights. Even still, they love to refer to guns as if being deprived of arms, is some sort of benefit.
(Excerpt) Read more at gunalizer.com ...
Facts trump loosey goosey ‘feelings’ every time...
>> Did the anti-gun nut refuse to be on at the same time as John Lott on c-span because he had no counter argument? <<
This outcome is apparently nothing new.
According to what John Lott emailed Glenn Reynolds last week, the Brady Bunch and their allies ALWAYS refuse to appear on a program with Lott.
Lott also said that several times he has agreed to be on particular shows, only to have the bookings cancelled at the last minute. The reason? The Brady Bunchers have backed out when they learned they’d be facing Lott in debate.
In other words, the BBers know they can’t win a debate with a well-informed opponent, so they simply refuse to take part.
Exactly. They cannot win on facts, logic, reason, or the law, so they scream out feelings and lies.
The problem is that they are backed by the old media and the elites.
Not to the un/ill-informed. And, they're speaking directly to un/ill-conformed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.