Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robert Edmonds and Caroline Banuelos came through!
peace and justice sonoma co ^ | 04/29/2015 | pjcsonoma

Posted on 05/03/2015 12:49:45 AM PDT by Rabin

Dear Sonoma County Board of Supervisors, As Chair and Vice Chair of the Sonoma County Community and Local Law Enforcement Task Force (CALLE), ...

The California Supreme (Court Copley Press v. Superior Court 2006) effectively changed California Penal Code, so that all independent oversight agencies, such as civilian review boards, oversight panels, and civil service commissions, must now cloak all officer records and findings of misconduct in strict confidentiality..., any independent investigation that would yield specific information about officer misconduct and patterns is stifled, and must come through an internal law enforcement investigation, or motions approved by a judge. Even then, information about specific officers is still exempt from public scrutiny, except if there is a conviction. California Peace Officers now have greater "privacy/transparency" protections than the public at-large and of any other professional group, including medical, financial and legal professionals.

(Excerpt) Read more at peaceandjusticesonomaco.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: andylopez; california; confidentiality; gelhaus; ihatecops; peterlee; ravitch; sonomacounty
www.peaceandjusticesonoma... Peace and Justice Center of Sonoma County 4 days ago - 13 year old murdered by PTSD war veteran deputy sheriff Eric Gelhaus ... Members of the Justice Coalition for Andy Lopez, Sonoma County Community ...

Rab.

1 posted on 05/03/2015 12:49:45 AM PDT by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rabin

Is this good or is this bad?


2 posted on 05/03/2015 2:10:43 AM PDT by Usagi_yo (Give me liberty or give me a cash settlement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo
.....all independent oversight agencies, such as civilian review boards, oversight panels, and civil service commissions, must now cloak all officer records and findings of misconduct in strict confidentiality

Apparently a done deal by they CASC. Doesn't sound good to me as the title implies. Perhaps it is sarcastic.

3 posted on 05/03/2015 2:58:01 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
The bigger question is how this conflicts with the requirement to produce such information in criminal court. That is required as Brady information. Additionally, it will be interesting to see how this would apply to discovery in civil cases looking for damages.

I can see having some protection against disclosure of findings in favor of an officer, there are many frivolous complaints. The public has a right to negative findings by these bodies.

4 posted on 05/03/2015 4:28:10 AM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson