Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aria
My neighbor’s son is a cop in California and he told her the driver of the van, like the captain of an airplane or ship, was responsible for the safety of the passengers and the guy should have been belted in.

I put my five-year-old on the school bus, and told the driver who is the "captain" of the bus, and who is responsible for the safety of the passengers, that my kid should be belted it. The school bus drive responded by telling me that they don't have seat belts.

I'm not disagreeing with what you said in your post, but I'm putting it better into context.

7 posted on 05/03/2015 3:12:21 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

These fools demand better protection for criminals than innocent kids. We conservatives knew that all along.


13 posted on 05/03/2015 3:20:56 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: FreeReign

School buses are actually designed for use without seat belts - that’s why the seats are (a) close together, (b) taller than typical car seats, and (c) heavily padded. They are designed so that, in the event of an accident, the child will hit the padded seats around him/her.

The idea is that this way is safer than seat belts because (a) many school-aged children on a bus would not use the seat belt properly anyway, and (b) in the event of a serious accident (especially involving fire) the time spent cutting kids out of seat belts could lead to further (and more serious) injuries.


14 posted on 05/03/2015 3:29:51 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson