[sickoflibs]

RE:”Scott Walker is a terrific governor and an attractive candidate, but he has no foreign policy experience–unlike Reagan, who did a weekly foreign policy radio broadcast for a decade, and did his own research. Walker could persuade me that he knows what he’s doing, but I haven’t heard much from him yet. Foreign policy is too important for the next administration for us to elect a president who needs on-the-job training”

???

Lets not be ridiculous.

I wasn't going to comment until I saw this ludicrous ending.

That is an argument for Cruz as POTUS??

[2ndDivisionVet]

That’s the author’s opinion. Maybe start a news site or a blog and share your opinions.

[DB]

Be honest. Walker has been all over the map with immigration and other larger than the state issues.

[9YearLurker]

Yep—though more of an argument warning of the potential for Walker to melt down in a campaign against Hillary.

My position of Cruz over Walker is that Cruz is at least less bad on illegal immigration.

[American Constitutionalist]

I wouldn’t say it’s a argument for Ted Cruz, it’s just the author’s reasoning to not put to much faith in Scott Walker’s foreign policy experiamce, or so they say, the lack of it.