?His death got ossified leadership out of the way and made the Islamofascists more effective.
(Is that what Obama intended?)
And who knows but what the whole plan succeeded (posthumously for Osama, but maybe not for Obama).
Odd, isn’t it, how those two names, “Obama” and “Osama” conflate so easily? And by no means am I the only one to notice this, as Ted Kennedy had a little trouble keeping them straight.
Yes it is.
With the large scale attacks it takes months even years of planning and preparations.
The longer the planning and preparation the easier it is to pick up on the plot and stop it.
Also in a letter from OBL to Mullah Omar, OBL says the media, meaning the news, is 90% of the preparation for the battle(attack).
The terrorist don’t have the ability to orchestrate a news story and keep the orchestrated news story going for weeks or months on end as part of the preparation for the attacks.
Only the democrats can orchestrate a news story and keep it going for weeks or months.
Knowing that 90% of the preparations for the attack are in the news, find the orchestrated news story and it’s simple to put a name to who it is that orchestrated the news.
This is where the Benghazi “spontaneous” lie came from.
The terrorist simply picked up on a news story, the protest in Egypt, and spontaneously planned the attack.
Right now they are in the process of trying to make people believe the terrorist simply picked up on the dems honoring Peanuts Carter at their convention and planned the attack as a repeat of the Iranians attacking our embassy and taking hostages and it all happened in just a few days.