Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/30/2015 7:52:30 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer; cripplecreek; MeganC; Jet Jaguar
History Repeats itself, for anyone who doubts this artcile, here is an excellent Segment in the Documentary Battleship

I encourage everyone to watch the whole link.

https://youtu.be/aoHzFfW0jhY?t=4m40s

We have made it to where our Navy (or Air Force) can't incur any loses without it severely damaging us.

2 posted on 05/30/2015 8:00:14 AM PDT by KC_Lion (PLEASE SUPPORT FR. Donate Monthly or Join Club 300! G-d bless you all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

I read this entire article a few days ago. I commented about my concern of the vulnerability of aircraft carriers. But those with far more knowledge than me told me they were quite capable and well protected. I can’t imagine the United States is sitting back and not on the cutting edge of all kinds of military technology


3 posted on 05/30/2015 8:01:37 AM PDT by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

I’m finding it very interesting that so much effort is being put out to deride Naval Airpower and Aircraft Carriers.

It makes me suspicious to say the least.


4 posted on 05/30/2015 8:04:07 AM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Later


6 posted on 05/30/2015 8:19:43 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
Supercavitating torpedoes  —  such as the Russian Shkval  —  already travel at 200 knots per hour...

It'd be more credible if it got basic information, like units of speed, correct.

8 posted on 05/30/2015 8:30:00 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Hwaet! Lar bith maest hord, sothlice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

2nd article in as many days or so, essentially claiming the same thing...

It’s a tad curious...


9 posted on 05/30/2015 8:30:41 AM PDT by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Thread from a few days ago for comments:http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3294256/posts

The real basis of this essay is that the welfare state needs the military’s budget.
There are a few other (good) points thrown in.


10 posted on 05/30/2015 8:33:38 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
Of course, the reason that no one had yet sunk a battleship from the air  —  in combat  —  was that no one had yet tried.

WRONG. On both points. At the Battle of Taranto, in November of 1940, the British sunk an Italian battleship and damaged two more - from the air with slow Swordfish biplanes.

16 posted on 05/30/2015 9:08:13 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

as i was reading i wondered are submarines protected from EMP? does anyone know. Could EMP wipe out a task force?


21 posted on 05/30/2015 9:29:09 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (civil law: commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong Blackstone Commentaries I p44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
Carriers will become obsolete when they no longer have air supremacy, ship board defense (and group), and ASW.

Right now the strike group has all three.

Hitting Beijing from the sea is something to think about, right Sun Tzu?

5.56mm

24 posted on 05/30/2015 9:37:32 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

26 posted on 05/30/2015 9:43:54 AM PDT by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Whatever became of the “if it flies, it dies” slogan used by the Navy?


27 posted on 05/30/2015 9:44:17 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer; blueyon; KitJ; T Minus Four; xzins; CMS; The Sailor; ab01; txradioguy; Jet Jaguar; ...

Active Duty ping.


33 posted on 05/30/2015 10:23:45 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

We could learn a lot from history.

http://www.wired.com/2014/08/the-wwi-battleships-that-saved-and-doomed-the-british-empire/


34 posted on 05/30/2015 10:45:54 AM PDT by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Coastal anti-ship batteries, submarines and air superiority can cause area denial to a carrier battle group. During hostilities, some places are just too dangerous to take such a valuable asset.

This infographic gives me pause. The Chinese seem to be banking on some very dangerous strategies.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-27/who-would-win-conflict-south-china-sea-infographic


42 posted on 05/30/2015 4:01:43 PM PDT by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Interesting article. I think we are going to see an age of small drone carriers that will come along in another five years. The drones are being developed now. We will see the fifth generation fighter in a secondary role once we see that drone technology fully launched.


49 posted on 05/30/2015 7:14:32 PM PDT by KC Burke (Ceterum censeo Islam esse delendam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer
----- we must ask the question whether we can afford them.-----

We need them to protect the really important ships


55 posted on 05/31/2015 4:40:42 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Lots of good info. Things are changing very fast. R and D is working the laser angle....check out the USS Ponce. Mach 5 missiles may seem fast now but when compared to lasers they are standing still.


77 posted on 06/01/2015 7:43:03 PM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, WIN LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson