To: Kaslin
I guess reading to a kid is better than nothing. Kind of like giving a fish to a starving man. Of course teaching the kid to read for himself is what should always be done (at least by the time the kid is 4).
8 posted on
06/01/2015 7:32:53 AM PDT by
BobL
(REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my 'about' page))
To: BobL
It almost always starts by reading to them.
9 posted on
06/01/2015 7:40:05 AM PDT by
marktwain
To: BobL
Large value in both -
for a pre-Ker, reading to them gives them a love of books that carries over into the time after they learn to read.
10 posted on
06/01/2015 7:42:56 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: BobL
Reading to your child is more then just helping them with their reading skills, it allows you to discuss the story and ask “what if?” questions.
18 posted on
06/01/2015 11:00:41 AM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson