Oh I am well aware I don’t know it all. I never claimed to know it all. Not once. Ever.
I do however have the ability to read. I also have the ability to understand that when a person consistently backs people that support less than conservative ideals and align themselves with positions taken by the biggest problems we face today, namely the GOP and DNC, I don’t need to look any deeper nor posses omnipotence to come to a correct conclusion.
That being the people in question support liberalism at the expense of more conservative options. That is simple cause and effect.
If the name Rick Perry was stricken from history and someone was on FR saying “I support a man that forces dangerous drugs on children without parental consent, opposes border control that has proven effective for 3000 years, thinks Hillary was a great SOS, supports illegal land takings, wants to enrich his donors at the expense of his voters and thinks people opposing his beliefs are heartless, you would rightly think the person was a textbook liberal. You would also think anyone backing that person was likewise a liberal because every single one of those things is textbook liberal dogma.
But those things are just what Rick Perry did/believed and promoted. And it does not make his backers conservative because his name and his person are real and not a hypothetical.
What does your animosity toward me and Rick Perry have to do with Scott Walker? Scott Walker, who upon taking office, revoked instate tuition for illegals (only state/gov to do this).
Rick Perry would have locked down the border and policed it, worked to fix this, but you have such a bug about him that you’re blind to anything other than attacking people on your side.
“...the biggest problems we face today, namely the GOP and DNC.”
The GOP and DNC are not two problems. They are one party.