Today I signed an Executive Order banning the Supreme Court.
Here we go, another effort by Obama to intimidate SCOTUS. And hey, why not, it worked the first time!
So if the Supremes require enforcement of 0bama’s law, that’s wrong?
How dare the proletariat question the King!
How dare we!
Dam.....
Well, he should know! He’s a Constitutional expert, after all... [/sheesh]
For him go on the offensive on this issue overseas, he must already know he lost. He is getting a statement out for his liberal base.
The whole fricking law is twisted. The very way in which it came to be law was twisted.
Obama is twisted. A sick and twisted bastard (literally and figuratively a bastard.)
Wow, what a jerk.
Apparently he’s unfamiliar with separation of powers.
2016 can’t come fast enough.
I wonder if he got a “heads up” that the USSC will vote in his favor. That is why he is acting so uppity.
panic.....
Pelosi’s secret source on the Court knows its not going to go well.
Blank you Mr. President.
For an alleged constitutional law teacher, you are dumb as a bag of rocks. It is not up to the president to decide which cases the Supreme Court takes and which it declines to hear.
He really overstepped his bounds here. But the media will not call him out on it.
The plain text of the law sounds clear to me. Yet he claims that only a twisted interpretation would result in exchanges run by the states and not the federal government.
He should go talk to Nancy P. His real problem should be with a convoluted 2000 page law which was not read and understood before being rammed through on a party line vote. And the related issue of confusing language in this 2000 page law.
Will anyone in the media talk about what I just mentioned about confusing language and problems in ramming thru unread 2000 page bills? Its that confusion and misunderstanding of how this law is to be administered which resulted in this particular court case.
Today I signed an Executive Order banning the Supreme Court.
Now, he's telling the Supreme Court what cases they SHOULD have taken up, or not. It's a window into his thinking.
And he's issuing this criticism while on foreign soil, in front of a foreign press.
Whoa!
Yeah, I can see the outcome going either way, but it’s pretty ludicrous to say the case shouldn’t have been heard. He’s a jackass.
While on foreign soil, might criticizing and challenging the Judicial Branch of one’s own government appear to be an unseemly tactic for establishing one’s own leadership qualities with other foreign leaders?