Posted on 06/20/2015 2:58:57 PM PDT by Randall_S
From Bare Naked Islam:
Barack Hussein Obama together with Hillary Clinton decided to aid and abet al-Qaeda terrorists and Libyan Muslim Brotherhood jihadists to overthrow U.S. ally Muammar Ghaddafi and replace all the secular leaders in the Middle East with sharia-compliant Muslim Brotherhood governments.
Former CIA Operations and Intelligence Analyist, Officer, Clare Lozez, says that “America has switched sides in the war on terror under Barack Obama.” She said the global war on terror had been an effort to “stay free of Sharia,” or repressive Islamic law, until the Obama administration began siding with such jihadist groups as the Muslim Brotherhood and its affiliates.
Why the switch? Lopez explained, when the so-called Arab Spring appeared in late 2010, “It was time to bring down the secular Muslim rulers who did not enforce Islamic law. And America helped.”
With the Muslim Brotherhood thoroughly infiltrated through the Obama regimeand other branches of the federal government, Lopez has come to the conclusion Obama had essentially the same goals in the Mideast as the late Osama bin Laden: “to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands.”
Al Qaeda = Hamas = Muslim Brotherhood = Hezbollah = Qatar = Iran.
Get it?
Former Israeli Ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren: Obama may reach out to Islam because 2 Muslim father figures abandoned him.
Do you get it now?
For a comprehensive, detailed, and sourced report on the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood see The Betrayal Papers.
Link to video: https://youtu.be/Z7v4KWRzeFs
That is treason.
Christopher Stevens was first American Envoy to Al Qaeda
......aaaaaaaaand now he’s dead.
Swap for Blind Sheikh went wrong...
“She said the global war on terror had been an effort to “stay free of Sharia,” “
Oh? Then why was bush holding hands with the Saudis? And why get rid of secular Saddam? Talk about horseshite.
She’s saying the War on Terror to that point had been to steer clear of helping Sharia-abiding groups. Obama and Clinton (and I’d include McCain) changed policy by helping such groups.
A lot of ant hills have been knocked down over there and the ants are largely fighting among themselves. That’s the only sense I can make out of it.
I see your point. I agree, helping the Saudis is a glaring. My guess is they were our most able partner in counter-balancing both Iraq and Iran. Saddam started a second war by invading Kuwait. The seeds of his own fall were sown there.
Oh? Then why was bush holding hands with the Saudis? And why get rid of secular Saddam? Talk about horseshite.
++++
Watch the video. The gal makes no such claim. Her point is simply that Obama has caused us to switch sides in the War on Terror by assisting the Jihadis and the Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow friendly secular governments and replace them with those that would enforce Sharia.
There was no mention of Bush who was hardly motivated by worries about Sharia.
This would be Iraq, Syria, Libya, Egypt and I think she specifically mentioned Tunisia.
The events of the last several years certainly support that theory. For me it is best to view this as I believe Obama views it:
West vs Muslim choose Muslim
Shia vs Sunni choose Sunni
That is the essential Obama Foreign Policy and it was supported from the get-go by Hillary.
Why, yes, the booze hound Hillary Clinton is a secret Moslem.
She wants to wear a burka and cook goats.
Nope.
There are Moslem sympathizers in the Obama Administration, but the real evidence slaps us in the face every day.
Hillary and Obama are greedy thieves.
The more time we spend screwing around trying to prove these two Shills are Moslems, the less time we look at the fact that they are crooks.
Filthy, stinking, liars, thieves, con men, who have people killed.
When President Bush and Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia met in Crawford, Tex., last week, they did something very un-Texan: they walked hand in hand.
Americans may raise an eyebrow at men holding hands, but in the Arab world, affection among men is common, and without sexual connotation.
‘’Holding hands is the warmest expression of affection between men,’’ said Samir Khalaf, a sociology professor at American University of Beirut in Lebanon. ‘’It’s a sign of solidarity and kinship.’’
In fact, if a man chooses not to touch another in a greeting, it can be interpreted as a sign of distance or disdain. Kissing cheeks, long handshakes and clutching hands are meant to reflect amity, devotion and most important, equality in status, noted Fuad Ishak Khuri, a social anthropologist, in his book, ‘’The Body in Islamic Culture’’ (2001).
The more time we spend screwing around trying to prove these two Shills are Moslems, the less time we look at the fact that they are crooks.
++++
I think you are correct about Hillary. Plotting to get more of that Saudi money probably still keeps her awake at night. Everything we know about the Clintons just screams out CROOK.
Obama is more complex. Is he a crook? Probably, but his actions look to me to paint him as Sunni Muslim Marxist. That may be redundant but it fits him like a glove and fully explains his actions both foreign and domestic while he occupied and continues to occupy the Oval Office.
Back to is he a crook? We will have confirmation on that in the coming years when the “payback for all his good works” starts to flow into his bank accounts in Switzerland and elsewhere.
Stay tuned.
They are not muslims.
They are socialists. Socialists and radical islam have been in bed together for decades. They wish to carve the world up between them and when it is over, they will fight each other over the spoils.
Yes, in the meantime, socialists love to enrich themselves while they rail against the top 1%.
But, keep in mind, that this is an international alliance to divide the world.
Obama said he was going to side with the Muzzies when he was elected.
And you have proved by the above statement, that you clearly understand some aspects of the conflict.
There are other aspects, and the above named politicians are the last people I would trust to make the correct tactical and strategic decisions, for the USA in particular, civilization in general, or for all of mankind.
The king was very unsteady, quite frail - as I remember the account - Bush held his arm to keep him from toppling over -
:The king was very unsteady, quite frail “
Eggs Ackley. No big deal at all!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.