To: markomalley
Scalia is a treasure. Too bad he is from another place and time, and there are no more like him.
As far as those burns go, yeah, they make ya feel good but they amount to nothing more than flipping off the guy who kills you right before he kills you.
America is now fundamentally changed, and Obama was not the only agent of change, he was one of many.
2 posted on
06/25/2015 1:53:59 PM PDT by
chris37
(Heartless)
To: markomalley
I think there was a typo in Scalia’s opinion.
Isn’t it SCROTUMcare?
3 posted on
06/25/2015 1:55:09 PM PDT by
x1stcav
(Why does Eleanor Clift always look like her private parts are causing her acute pain?)
To: markomalley
jiggery-pokery
That is both racist and misogynist. This dissent must be erased from the law books.
4 posted on
06/25/2015 1:55:41 PM PDT by
Cboldt
To: markomalley
I'd say keep the unconstitutional travesty known as Obamacare - on Obama’s shoulders.
You want the blame to go to the Supreme Court? Maybe the dissent was meant to do just that...
5 posted on
06/25/2015 1:56:21 PM PDT by
KittenClaws
( Normalcy Bias. Do you have it?)
To: markomalley
Scalia is basically accusing the Court of fraud. Scalia knows that pressure is being applied from outside and is stating as much.
6 posted on
06/25/2015 2:00:27 PM PDT by
Hoosier-Daddy
("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
To: markomalley
THe SCOTUS has surrendered it’s moral authority and is now nothing more than a political arem of the tyranny being imposed from DC.
They are no longer relevant, and they are no longer to be respected as the arbiters of constitutionality of laws.
12 posted on
06/25/2015 2:20:04 PM PDT by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: markomalley
So simple question.... since the SCOUS had ruled that
“Exchange established by the State it means Exchange established by the State or the Federal Government.”
They what verbage must one use to have Exchange established by the State means Exchange established by the State”....only
I mean in this Freudian craziness the Supreme Court is now engaged in their language.....sometimes a cigar is just a cigar
And sometimes we do need to write law were a state needs to be just a state ....seems it’s now impossible to actually legal express that idea...
13 posted on
06/25/2015 2:33:38 PM PDT by
tophat9000
(An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
To: markomalley
Scalia is a brilliant man.
We all need to start calling it SCOTUS-Care. That will keep the issue of an unjust court in the public mind. Every time the term is used it will remind everyone of the fact that the Supremes ignored the language of the law and simply chose to enforce something other than what was written.
16 posted on
06/25/2015 2:49:24 PM PDT by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: markomalley
"...[Various nonsensical "findings" and perfect examples of illogical thought] will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence."
Established law. How cool is that?
17 posted on
06/25/2015 3:05:50 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: markomalley
I have always had reservations about Judge Scalia but his dissent is one for the ages.
21 posted on
06/25/2015 3:12:35 PM PDT by
Cyman
(We have to pass it to see what's in it= definition of stool sample)
To: markomalley
The current Chief Justice and the current Pope have a lot in common. They are making it up as they go along. Lawlessness and corruption at the very top of both organizations.
23 posted on
06/25/2015 3:18:34 PM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: markomalley
Under all the usual rules of interpretation, in short, the Government should lose this case. But normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present Court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved.Thank God for Justice Scalia. Unfortunately we still have this abomination of a law.
24 posted on
06/25/2015 3:39:51 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Let us now try liberty)
To: markomalley
And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites...Kagan, the unwise latina, Bader-Ginsburg.... ugh.
25 posted on
06/25/2015 3:44:29 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Let us now try liberty)
To: markomalley
I like the term Scobamacare. I don’t want to let Obama off the hook that easily.
27 posted on
06/25/2015 4:28:49 PM PDT by
randita
(...Our First Lady is a congenital liar - William Safire, 1996)
To: markomalley
Well, I look at the bright side.
I have Six more names to add to my “Domestic Enemies” list.
35 posted on
06/25/2015 8:48:32 PM PDT by
Kickass Conservative
(Tag Line Quota has been exceeded. Check back for Updates.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson