Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court renames Obamacare SCOTUScare: Court offers to write future legislation for Congress..
Center of the American Experiment Blog ^ | June 25, 2015 | Kim Crockett

Posted on 06/25/2015 7:22:53 PM PDT by rhema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 06/25/2015 7:22:53 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema

Chief Justus Johnny Bob and his pal Barack Hussein Obama can both kiss my @$$.


2 posted on 06/25/2015 7:30:13 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Zippity Doo Dah, Zippity Ay! Yeeeeee Haw!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

“Good news from the Supreme Court today: If you like your health care subsidies, you can keep them. If you like limited government and the separation of powers, you are out of luck. “


3 posted on 06/25/2015 7:38:11 PM PDT by Pelham (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

The supreme court should always be referred to as the “LAWLESS COURT” from this day forward.


4 posted on 06/25/2015 7:40:49 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Might as well write everything.

Apparently the ones we voted for can’t do shit.


5 posted on 06/25/2015 7:54:38 PM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Essentially the Court blessed the Executive usurped power to rewrite laws and by extrapolation, to write new laws by simply keeping a law’s title and replacing all of the content. This at the same time that Congress is eagerly giving up its powers to the Executive. The Revolution has, in fact, happened. It is now left but to get rid of Kerensky and the “moderates.” Then the Reforming of society can shift into high gear.


6 posted on 06/25/2015 7:57:01 PM PDT by arthurus (It's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Well, we are here. One Branch of Government.

Don’t think for a moment that Husseins 100 Czars have not been hard at work.

“Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters. ”

God will not save us from our government. He will save us from our life.


7 posted on 06/25/2015 8:00:09 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema; All

Obama, Franken, Roberts.


8 posted on 06/25/2015 8:01:17 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Without the IRS, Obamacare would not be possible.

I am at least glad that I never chose to look to the IRS for employment, even when I was out of almost all other options. I felt it was anti Constitutional and anti American, even when I was 21. Even though there was no Internet and I had no education in government or law, it did not take me much time to sit down and figure that out.

Now I think it might be time for someone in a position to make a change to help with a paradigm shift— a new Thomas Paine.

The rule of law is broken. All options are on the table now.

In preparation for that time, let the unfortunate boating accidents commence.


9 posted on 06/25/2015 8:10:15 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Chief Justus Johnny Bob and his pal Barack Hussein Obama can both kiss my @$$.

Right part of the anatomy. However, they prefer a different bathhouse act.

10 posted on 06/25/2015 8:17:36 PM PDT by peyton randolph (Hillary Kardashian Clinton - famous for being infamous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema

We have two branches of government writing laws, while the branch constitutionally responsible for writing laws asleep.

We’re so screwed. Pray that America wakes up. But I doubt it will happen before the collapse.


11 posted on 06/25/2015 8:25:46 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

“Might as well write everything.

Apparently the ones we voted for can’t do shit.”

There is of course good reason for Congress to be tided into doing nothing most of the time. An active congress is after all a dangerous congress.


12 posted on 06/25/2015 8:25:48 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Obamadontcare and Scotusdontcare...about the Constitution.


13 posted on 06/25/2015 8:26:10 PM PDT by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema

I think it should be renamed ROBERTScare.
See how he likes HIS name on it.


14 posted on 06/25/2015 8:35:39 PM PDT by tinamina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
"Setting up and running an Exchange involve significant burdens—meeting strict deadlines, §18041(b), implementing requirements related to the offering of insurance plans, §18031(d)(4), setting up outreach programs, §18031(i), and ensuring that the Exchange is self-sustaining by 2015, §18031(d)(5)(A). A State would have much less reason to take on these burdens if its citizens could receive tax credits no matter who establishes its Exchange. (Now that the Internal Revenue Service has interpreted §36B to authorize tax credits everywhere, by the way, 34 States have failed to set up their own Exchanges. Ante, at 6.) So even if making credits available on all Exchanges advances the goal of improving healthcare markets, it frustrates the goal of encouraging state involvement in the implementation of the Act.

Scalia (unknowingly?) identifies the real goal of the scheme in part II of the dissent: single payer gubmint health care. Between him and Thomas, two of the best minds on the current SCOTUS.

15 posted on 06/25/2015 8:36:02 PM PDT by cport (How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cport

OOPS, part III of the dissent.


16 posted on 06/25/2015 8:38:19 PM PDT by cport (How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Scalia's final paragraph

"Perhaps the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Actwill attain the enduring status of the Social Security Act or the Taft-Hartley Act; perhaps not. But this Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (“penalty” means tax, “further [Medicaid] payments to the State” means only incremental Medicaid payments to the State, “established by the State”means not established by the State) will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence.And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takesto uphold and assist its favorites. I dissent."

I wish we could clone him.

17 posted on 06/25/2015 8:45:35 PM PDT by cport (How can political capital be spent on a bunch of ingrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
. The Revolution has, in fact, happened. It is now left but to get rid of Kerensky and the “moderates.” Then the Reforming of society can shift into high gear.

Welcome to the New Socialist Caliphate of the Western Hemisphere.

18 posted on 06/25/2015 8:52:36 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Who the heck is ever going to want to go to trial in this country when judges can interpret statutes anyway they want ?


19 posted on 06/25/2015 9:16:13 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Seems like everyone writes our laws except for the people we elect to write the laws.


20 posted on 06/25/2015 9:18:27 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson