Chief Justus Johnny Bob and his pal Barack Hussein Obama can both kiss my @$$.
“Good news from the Supreme Court today: If you like your health care subsidies, you can keep them. If you like limited government and the separation of powers, you are out of luck. “
The supreme court should always be referred to as the “LAWLESS COURT” from this day forward.
Might as well write everything.
Apparently the ones we voted for can’t do shit.
Essentially the Court blessed the Executive usurped power to rewrite laws and by extrapolation, to write new laws by simply keeping a law’s title and replacing all of the content. This at the same time that Congress is eagerly giving up its powers to the Executive. The Revolution has, in fact, happened. It is now left but to get rid of Kerensky and the “moderates.” Then the Reforming of society can shift into high gear.
Obama, Franken, Roberts.
Without the IRS, Obamacare would not be possible.
I am at least glad that I never chose to look to the IRS for employment, even when I was out of almost all other options. I felt it was anti Constitutional and anti American, even when I was 21. Even though there was no Internet and I had no education in government or law, it did not take me much time to sit down and figure that out.
Now I think it might be time for someone in a position to make a change to help with a paradigm shift— a new Thomas Paine.
The rule of law is broken. All options are on the table now.
In preparation for that time, let the unfortunate boating accidents commence.
We have two branches of government writing laws, while the branch constitutionally responsible for writing laws asleep.
We’re so screwed. Pray that America wakes up. But I doubt it will happen before the collapse.
Obamadontcare and Scotusdontcare...about the Constitution.
I think it should be renamed ROBERTScare.
See how he likes HIS name on it.
Scalia (unknowingly?) identifies the real goal of the scheme in part II of the dissent: single payer gubmint health care. Between him and Thomas, two of the best minds on the current SCOTUS.
"Perhaps the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Actwill attain the enduring status of the Social Security Act or the Taft-Hartley Act; perhaps not. But this Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (“penalty” means tax, “further [Medicaid] payments to the State” means only incremental Medicaid payments to the State, “established by the State”means not established by the State) will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence.And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takesto uphold and assist its favorites. I dissent."
I wish we could clone him.
Who the heck is ever going to want to go to trial in this country when judges can interpret statutes anyway they want ?
Scalia really takes Roberts to the woodshed in his Dissent.
The system of checks and balances, so-called, is gone - as the SCOTUS has now become yet another gay Obama butt amusement.
Where does it stop?
The “living breathing constitution” interpretation of “intent” means goodbye second amendment, goodbye first amendment.
“Founders never intended for you to do anything except hunt or engage in sportsman activities with flintlocks...”
“Founders never intended you to challenge liberalism, even using their own words to show hypocrisy, lies, and false witness is wrong!”
How many legislators had to “intend” something in a piece of legislation?
If an aspect was discussed but not included in a bill because it wouldn’t pass, can it still be considered part of the intent and therefore a part of the law?
Does a majority have to have intended to include some provision? Simple majority? Two thirds majority?
Does the president’s intent in signing a bill overrule all other intents?
Do the intentions of subsequent legislators, presidents, and push poll surveys overrule the original sponsors’ intentions?
#DamnTheGodsInBlackDresses
It is on tape the admin saying this was to make states set up exchanges otherwise theyd get no federal money. On purpose.
Scotus is lying.
Screwed again, bend over!