You still think we’d be exactly where we are today with Mitt Romney. I blame everyone who didn’t vote for Romney.
That isn’t the point, the purpose in reminding republicans of who Romney is, is one, to limit his influence on the GOP, as it’s “elder statesman, the role that he is trying to play to influence the platform and the 2016 election.
The other primary reason, is to remind them to look deeper into these people, never allow a pro-abortion/pro-gay/anti-gun, radical leftist, who left the GOP because of Reagan and became a democrat supporter, donor, fund raiser, and voter, and then returned to the GOP in October of 1993, with the agenda that you posted to in post 4, to spend 50 million dollars of his own money to take over the GOP and become it’s party head, and presidential nominee.
You still think we’d be exactly where we are today with Mitt Romney.I do, actually.
Both Romney and McCain wanted nothing more than to "fit in" with the liberal elite. They both would have passed "PelosiCare" if it had reached their desks, so as not to appear "mean".
And I have no doubt that they would have rolled over on the Gaystapo.
I held my nose and voted for each of them, and all it accomplished was to convince the GOPe that I would support them regardless of what they did.
No more.
If Bush, in particular, gets the nomination, I will NOT vote for him. I will write in my preferred candidate.
At this point, the only way to effect change is to make it clear to the GOPe that we will NOT support them as long as they won't support us.
I will no longer vote for "Dem-lite".