Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy

I’m talking about a church, not a county clerk. That’s not discriminatory. They’re told at the outset the church’s beliefs and principles, and they sign on to them, or they go elsewhere.


35 posted on 06/30/2015 10:35:26 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Pray for their victory or quit saying you support our troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

They are coming after the church.


38 posted on 06/30/2015 10:39:38 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

It would be interesting to dump all the legal recognition stuff on the state. Would they be able to accommodate it? Also, you know the state would try to claim a vested interest in having successful marriages. So, it’s very likely they would develop some sort of screening and/or premarital educational programs. But what possible standards could they invoke now that couldn’t be claimed to be discriminatory by someone? They’re creating this mess, let them take care of it.


44 posted on 06/30/2015 10:44:01 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson