Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PROCON

And yeah, this number means EXACTLY what it would have meant under Bush! (Or even Clinton.)

Bull-ogna.


14 posted on 07/02/2015 6:44:48 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

If Bush was so horrible why are there numbers still worse that those when Bush was president? In his 7th year he has provided a better environment than Obama. Even if you accept these top level numbers, no one on the left can explain how Bush was terrible when unemployment was 4.7 and Obama is brilliant when it’s at 5.3.


34 posted on 07/02/2015 6:55:20 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson