Nowhere does Maraniss state that Cindy Pratt is his sole source. That is such a simple statement, and yet you cannot grasp it.
What if, contrary to fact, Maraniss DID state that Cindy was his lone source? Does Obot logic then insist that we must, in some mythical way, *know* that she is wrong? You seem to believe that any evidence-free statement you make is true, while any statement Maraniss makes which he corroborates is false. It is a weird world you inhabit.
All Maraniss does is unequivocally state that SAD and the baby never lived at the ‘home address’ on the BC. That is the explosion of the myth. SAD had no HI address at that time, so one was used at which she was not living. I don’t expect you to comprehend the ramifications of that.
It’s obviously above your paygrade.
Nor does he list any other sources for the address of the Dunhams.
Except of course for the Honolulu City Directory.
He lists two sources. Period. Of course not counting your “fantasy” sources.
Again all you have shown is that SAD entered her parents’ address (an address that she lived at least until February, 1961) on his birth certificate. Wow