Posted on 07/21/2015 2:41:10 AM PDT by markomalley
After ostensibly trying to separate global warming from national security concerns, Democratic presidential candidate Martin O’Malley Monday jumped on the bandwagon of those claiming global warming created the conditions necessary for Islamic State to grow.
“One of the things that preceded the failure of the nation-state of Syria and the rise of ISIS was the effect of climate change and the mega-drought that affected that region, wiped out farmers, drove people to cities, created a humanitarian crisis that created the symptoms — or rather the conditions of extreme poverty — that has now led to the rise of ISIL and this extreme violence,” O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland, told Bloomberg news in a question about foreign policy.
O’Malley’s comments echo those of the Obama administration and environmentalists who are trying to paint global warming as not just an environmental issue, but also a national security problem.
In May, Obama told graduates of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy to prepare for the fight against global warming. The White House has been trying to shift the focus of global warming away from temperature and more towards public health and national security.
In past comments, O’Malley made a point to declare global warming a “natural threat,” distinguishing it from “man-made” threats, the greatest of which he said is a nuclear Iran.
“The greatest danger that we face right now on a consistent basis in terms of manmade threats is — is — nuclear Iran and related to that, extremist violence,” O’Malley told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos March 29. “I don’t think you can separate the two. I think they go together.”
“In terms of natural threats, clearly, it’s climate change. And we have to confront — we have to confront manmade and natural threats,” O’Malley added.
Now it seems O’Malley is playing up the national security side of global warming, joining a chorus of scientists and environmental activists claiming the war in Syria is a prime example of how a warming Earth will cause violent conflicts.
For years, reports have been trickling out attempting to link the beginnings of Syria’s deadly civil war and the rise of Islamic State to global warming. Most recently, a study out of the University of California, Berkeley argued that man-made global warming made Syria’s 2006 to 2010 drought worse, therefore driving political discontent and civil war.
Though the study’s authors are careful not claim that the drought directly caused the rise of ISIS, liberal media outlets were quick to make the jump.
So, is global warming responsible for the rise of Islamic State? Not likely.
Even if a drought did exacerbate tensions in Syria, research shows environmental factors are rarely the cause of violent conflict. Other researchers have postulated it was the Bashar Assad regime’s response to the drought that sparked tensions, not the drought itself. Syrians are no strangers to prolonged, vicious droughts. People there have weathered their way through low rainfall.
In terms of the climate science behind the claim: there’s not much evidence of a man-made fingerprint on the climatic backdrop of the conflict.
“It is not until you dig pretty deep into the technical scientific literature, that you find out that the anthropogenic climate change impact on drought conditions in the Fertile Crescent is extremely minimal and tenuous—so much so that it is debatable as to whether it is detectable at all,” wrote Chip Knappenberger and Patrick Michaels, climate scientists at the libertarian Cato Institute March 5.
The two scientists argued “the identifiable influence of human-caused climate change on recent drought conditions in the Fertile Crescent was almost certainly not the so-called straw that broke the camel’s back and led to the outbreak of conflict in Syria.”
Drought “conditions which are part and parcel of the region climate and the intensity and frequency of which remain dominated by natural variability, even in this era of increasing greenhouse gas emissions from human activities,” the scientists added.
They live in a freakin desert, moron....
Yep! Allah them SUVs the Christians drove in the Crusades are to blame!
I hope they push so far to the left they fall off a cliff.
This is the mental midget who apologized for saying “ all lives matter”
This is the paragon of wisdom who proclaimed that George W Bush was a greater threat to the USA than al Qaeda
This is the patriot who put a tax on rain in MD
Yeah we really really want Martin OMalley as leader of the free world or even Hillary’s purse carrier
OK!! Everybody pay attention!
Lesson for today:
1. The sun is 1,300,000 times as big as the earth.
2. The sun is a ball of fire that controls the climates of all its planets.
3. The earth is one of the sun’s planets.
4. The earth is a speck in comparison to the size of the sun.
5. Inhabitants of the earth are less than specks.
Study Question: How do less-than-specks in congress plan to control the sun?
well, duh....gun control, putting the US Constitution through a shredder, and waving a bastardized version of rainbow flag. Obviously! :P
also, the stupid is strong in O'Malley. He is as self-absorbed as Obama...and figures if it worked for Obama, it'll work for him.
If these liberal idiots think that man has caused the earth to warm just wait for the wake up call they get in the next twenty years when the solar output is alleged to begin dropping.
Those idiots will be begging for global warming then.
The fall of man in the Garden of Eden created ISIS. It’s called SIN.
You are a one trick pony at a birthday party.
Now, if we could just get that as part of Common Core...
Thank you for the compliment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.