Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Navy to Get Over 20 Ship-Borne Fighter Jets by Year-End
Sputnik International ^ | 26.07.2015

Posted on 07/26/2015 9:45:29 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

The aviation branch of the Russian Navy will get more than 20 new ship-borne MiG-29K fighters by the end of 2015, the Defense Ministry’s press service said.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) — The warplanes will serve as a backbone for a new aviation unit within the Northern Feet.

"To boost the Navy’s aviation component, the work is underway to equip the Navy Aviation [branch] with MiG-29K. This work began in 2013 and will be finalized in 2015," the press service said in a statement, adding the Navy will get more than 20 MiGs.

Russia has been stepping up its presence in the Arctic since late 2014 when it revised its military doctrine to declare the region an area of its interest.

The Arctic is believed to have vast untapped reserves of oil and gas. The five Arctic Circle countries, comprising the United States, Russia, Canada, Norway, and Denmark, are particularly interested in exploring them.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; mig; mig29k; russia

1 posted on 07/26/2015 9:45:29 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

F-14 knock-off?


2 posted on 07/26/2015 9:58:34 AM PDT by brivette (lol~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brivette

Closer to F-15 it looks like...no swept wings it seems...


3 posted on 07/26/2015 10:00:27 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I’m probably wrong....again


4 posted on 07/26/2015 10:01:07 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

you’re right.


5 posted on 07/26/2015 10:01:11 AM PDT by brivette (lol~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I thought the Sov, er, Russkis didn’t like the MiG-29?


6 posted on 07/26/2015 10:02:45 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: brivette

I served on board an aircraft carrier and saw an F=14 go over board.


8 posted on 07/26/2015 10:04:19 AM PDT by brivette (lol~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

The Mig-29K is a new(er) generation multirole aircraft with development paid for by India. Russia’s existing Su-33s are only air defence capable and ordering a newer variant for a small fleet would be prohibitive.


9 posted on 07/26/2015 10:31:07 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

The 29 has really short legs, even after they added a dorsal fuel tank. I wonder why they didn’t use something from the Su-27 family?


10 posted on 07/26/2015 10:31:25 AM PDT by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: brivette
These days, "MiG" stands for the abbreviation in Russian of "Crappy line of obsolete Russian copies of US aircraft," while "Sukhoi" stands for "Other crappy line of obsolete Russian copies of US aircraft."

To be sure, MiGs and Sukhois can still be menacing to poorly armed and defended neighbors and are good enough for export to those with similar needs. Yet even when the politics and history are congenial, as with Brazil and India, foreign buyers increasingly prefer Western aircraft, which are more potent, safer, more reliable, and are designed for regular use, high sortie rates in power projection and in combat operations.

11 posted on 07/26/2015 10:35:30 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

Don’t forget the old YAK design bureau, they stank without copying anyone


12 posted on 07/26/2015 10:57:39 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: brivette

Lol, me too, on the JFK back in 1976! I seem to recall we are about 500 miles off the coast of Scotland… It was a big deal back then, it was a Russian cruiser shadowing us, and saw exactly where the plane went into the water...


13 posted on 07/26/2015 1:08:34 PM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant.Buy into it,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

The Yakovlev bureau tried copying or adapting Western designs and concepts, but they and the Soviet economy at large lacked the necessary technical base to do so with consistent, long term success.


14 posted on 07/26/2015 2:51:08 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

I am pretty sure the 141 was a purely domestic POS.


15 posted on 07/26/2015 7:39:41 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
After the USSR dissolved, Lockheed apparently saw some merit in the YAK-141 design because they partnered with Yakovlev to continue development. As it was, nothing tangible came of the effort, which suggests that in reality Lockheed paid for a look at the technology and decided not to pursue it.

Oddly, the Soviet educational system had a strongly meritocratic approach toward identifying and lavishing attention on students with ability in math, science, and engineering. This often led to conceptual innovations that alarmed the West but failed to translate into useful and reliable weapons. The larger defects of the Soviet system simply could not be avoided.

The MiG-25 Foxbat, for example, with an emergency high altitude speed of Mach 3.2, deserves credit as the world's fastest fighter jet ever to enter production. The aircraft though had limited range and maneuverability, and its massive engines had to be scrapped after a run at maximum speed. Supposedly, Iranian F-14s scored about ten MiG-25 kills during the Iran-Iraq war in the early 1980s.

16 posted on 07/26/2015 8:56:23 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham

The 141 might be workable with present technology though, but with the F-35 it would be pointless to pursue it.


17 posted on 07/27/2015 8:29:02 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Quite true. The F-35 has its issues, but in the end, it can and will be made to work. The Yak-141 apparently was not seen as worth the cost and effort.


18 posted on 07/27/2015 9:47:56 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson